Referential choice in L2 English: Comparing L1 Spanish and L1 Dutch speakers

Abstract Variability in the second language (L2) referential choice could be due to lower language proficiency in the L2 or cross-linguistic influence. We compare the L2 English referential choices of bilinguals of typologically different languages (Spanish and English, null subject and non-null subject) to those of bilinguals of typologically similar languages (Dutch and English, both non-null subject and both using pronouns similarly in the target context). Bilinguals’ performance was further compared to that of a group of functional monolingual English speakers. Both bilingual groups were highly proficient, to explore whether high proficiency would attenuate differences with monolinguals. Participants completed a picture-description task eliciting references to antecedents in two-character contexts. Performance was comparable among all three groups in all conditions—evidence that cross-linguistic influence did not play a role for bilingual referential choices. These results thus show that highly proficient bilinguals of both typologically different and similar languages can perform comparably to monolinguals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Psycholinguistics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716425100398
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Referential choice in L2 English: Comparing L1 Spanish and L1 Dutch speakers

Carla Contemori, Iva Ivanova, Petra Hendriks
Applied Psycholinguistics
Categorization, perception, and language
article

Referential choice in L2 English: Comparing L1 Spanish and L1 Dutch speakers

Carla Contemori, Iva Ivanova, Petra Hendriks
article en

Abstract

Abstract Variability in the second language (L2) referential choice could be due to lower language proficiency in the L2 or cross-linguistic influence. We compare the L2 English referential choices of bilinguals of typologically different languages (Spanish and English, null subject and non-null subject) to those of bilinguals of typologically similar languages (Dutch and English, both non-null subject and both using pronouns similarly in the target context). Bilinguals’ performance was further compared to that of a group of functional monolingual English speakers. Both bilingual groups were highly proficient, to explore whether high proficiency would attenuate differences with monolinguals. Participants completed a picture-description task eliciting references to antecedents in two-character contexts. Performance was comparable among all three groups in all conditions—evidence that cross-linguistic influence did not play a role for bilingual referential choices. These results thus show that highly proficient bilinguals of both typologically different and similar languages can perform comparably to monolinguals.

Applied PsycholinguisticsVol. 46
The University of Texas at El Paso (US), University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Referential choice in L2 English: Comparing L1 Spanish and L1 Dutch speakers — Carla Contemori, Iva Ivanova, et al. · Applied Psycholinguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS