Terrorism and U.S. and Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the Developing World

ABSTRACT Much scholarship finds a negative but inconsistent statistical relationship between host‐state terrorism and overseas foreign direct investment (FDI). However, empirical studies generally have not investigated terrorism in the context of Chinese overseas FDI. Comparing United States and Chinese overseas FDI for up to 107 developing countries from 2004–2018, and using a Two‐Stage‐Difference‐in‐Difference approach as well as a dynamic panel data analysis approach (i.e., the System General Method of Moments), we find a negative and at times statistically significant association between terrorism and U.S. FDI and a positive and frequently statistically significant relationship between terrorism and Chinese FDI, and this is true for both Chinese public and private investors. We argue that the U.S. and Chinese governments have different effects on overseas FDI, where the U.S. has a limited impact while China often encourages its firms to tolerate risk. Our research suggests that the nature of home governments affects the risk perception of their overseas investors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70113
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Terrorism and U.S. and Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the Developing World

Kelan Lu, Lance Y. Hunter, Glen Biglaiser
Global Policy
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Terrorism and U.S. and Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the Developing World

Kelan Lu, Lance Y. Hunter, Glen Biglaiser
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Much scholarship finds a negative but inconsistent statistical relationship between host‐state terrorism and overseas foreign direct investment (FDI). However, empirical studies generally have not investigated terrorism in the context of Chinese overseas FDI. Comparing United States and Chinese overseas FDI for up to 107 developing countries from 2004–2018, and using a Two‐Stage‐Difference‐in‐Difference approach as well as a dynamic panel data analysis approach (i.e., the System General Method of Moments), we find a negative and at times statistically significant association between terrorism and U.S. FDI and a positive and frequently statistically significant relationship between terrorism and Chinese FDI, and this is true for both Chinese public and private investors. We argue that the U.S. and Chinese governments have different effects on overseas FDI, where the U.S. has a limited impact while China often encourages its firms to tolerate risk. Our research suggests that the nature of home governments affects the risk perception of their overseas investors.

Global PolicyVol. 17(1)
University of North Texas (US), University of South Carolina (US), Augusta University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.