Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling

KEY MESSAGE: We evaluated four existing Monte Carlo-based methods for approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model. All four methods yielded consistent approximations of the exact values. Genomic prediction models, such as genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), use genomic data to improve the accuracy of estimated genetic values. As the number of genotypes and traits increases, the exact calculation of prediction error variances (PEVs) and reliabilities becomes computationally infeasible due to the need to invert the coefficient matrix of the mixed model equations, whose dimension increases directly with the number of individuals and traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the Monte Carlo (MC) sampling method to approximate PEVs and reliabilities in a multiple-trait GBLUP framework relevant to hybrid breeding. The MC method avoids direct matrix inversion by repeatedly sampling genetic values from their assumed distributions to approximate PEVs. We applied the MC method using four previously published formulas to approximate PEVs and reliabilities. All formulas produced consistent estimates of PEVs and reliabilities, with convergence rates depending on the formula, the level of reliability, and the MC sample size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05336-0
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling

Ismo Strandén, Andrew Heikkila, Martin Lidauer, Klaus Nordhausen et al.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling

Ismo Strandén, Andrew Heikkila, Martin Lidauer, Klaus Nordhausen, Sara Taskinen
article en

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: We evaluated four existing Monte Carlo-based methods for approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model. All four methods yielded consistent approximations of the exact values. Genomic prediction models, such as genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), use genomic data to improve the accuracy of estimated genetic values. As the number of genotypes and traits increases, the exact calculation of prediction error variances (PEVs) and reliabilities becomes computationally infeasible due to the need to invert the coefficient matrix of the mixed model equations, whose dimension increases directly with the number of individuals and traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the Monte Carlo (MC) sampling method to approximate PEVs and reliabilities in a multiple-trait GBLUP framework relevant to hybrid breeding. The MC method avoids direct matrix inversion by repeatedly sampling genetic values from their assumed distributions to approximate PEVs. We applied the MC method using four previously published formulas to approximate PEVs and reliabilities. All formulas produced consistent estimates of PEVs and reliabilities, with convergence rates depending on the formula, the level of reliability, and the MC sample size.

Theoretical and Applied GeneticsVol. 139(9)
Statistics Finland (FI), University of Helsinki (FI), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), Helsinki Art Museum (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Academy of Finland, China Scholarship Council, Jyväskylän Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.