Forage intake and digesta kinetics of lactating beef cattle differing in feed efficiency while grazing Idaho rangelands

The objective was to determine if 2-yr old cows differing in residual feed intake (RFI) would differ in forage intake and digesta kinetics. Previously classified 2-yr-old lactating Angus × Hereford cows (12 efficient, [EFF]; 12 inefficient, [INE]) were given a pulse dose of an alkane marker and outfitted with grazing collars. Fecal samples were then collected repeatedly over 4 d in June and August. Daily digestible organic matter (DOM) and crude protein (CP) were estimated from fecal near infrared spectroscopy. Data were analyzed by fitting a non-linear digesta kinetics model to individual cows. A mixed model with RFI treatment, period, and their interaction as fixed effects, and cow within treatment as a repeated random effect, was fitted to the combined kinetics data. There were no treatment differences (P > 0.05) between EFF and INE cows for the variables measured, but period differences were present (P < 0.05). Fecal output tended to increase from spring to summer (P = 0.08) and for INE cattle from spring to summer (P = 0.06) but EFF cattle did not differ from spring to summer (P = 0.59). Total marker residence time in the gastrointestinal tract (RTG) was 38.3 and 40.5 ± 1.2 h for INE and EFF cows, respectively in June, and 44.0 and 42.9 ± 1.2 h for INE and EFF cows in August, increasing (P < 0.001) for INE and tending to increase for EFF (P = 0.097). Period RTG was 39.4 vs. 43.4 ± 0.8 h for June vs. August (P < 0.01). Dry matter intake (DMI) in June was 15.6 ± 1.15 kg for INE cows and 17.6 ± 1.10 kg for EFF cows (P = 0.22). August DMI was 17.0 and 16.3 ± 1.10 kg for INE and EFF cows, respectively (P = 0.67). The DOM was 58.9% vs. 53.8% ± 0.36% for June vs. August (P < 0.0001) and CP was 15.0% ± 0.23% vs. 14.2% ± 0.22% (P < 0.05). The CP in the diet declined from spring to summer for EFF cattle (P < 0.05), but not for INE cattle (P = 0.22). The compartmental mass of undigested dry matter (fill) was 6.6 vs. 8.6 ± 0.42 kg for June vs. August (P < 0.01). Bite rates increased from spring to summer (P < 0.05) and for EFF cattle (P < 0.05), but not INE cattle (P = 0.52). Grazing time tended to increase from spring to summer (P = 0.06), and for INE cattle from spring to summer (P = 0.07), but not for EFF cattle (P = 0.41). Reasonable, though slightly inflated, estimates of DMI with the pulse dose procedure were obtained, but differences in DMI for RFI in a feedlot setting did not translate to a range setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf429
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forage intake and digesta kinetics of lactating beef cattle differing in feed efficiency while grazing Idaho rangelands

David M. Jaramillo, James Sprinkle, Douglas R. Tolleson, Carmen M Willmore et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Forage intake and digesta kinetics of lactating beef cattle differing in feed efficiency while grazing Idaho rangelands

David M. Jaramillo, James Sprinkle, Douglas R. Tolleson, Carmen M Willmore, Ronald M Lewis, J. B. Hall, Melinda J Ellison
article en

Abstract

The objective was to determine if 2-yr old cows differing in residual feed intake (RFI) would differ in forage intake and digesta kinetics. Previously classified 2-yr-old lactating Angus × Hereford cows (12 efficient, [EFF]; 12 inefficient, [INE]) were given a pulse dose of an alkane marker and outfitted with grazing collars. Fecal samples were then collected repeatedly over 4 d in June and August. Daily digestible organic matter (DOM) and crude protein (CP) were estimated from fecal near infrared spectroscopy. Data were analyzed by fitting a non-linear digesta kinetics model to individual cows. A mixed model with RFI treatment, period, and their interaction as fixed effects, and cow within treatment as a repeated random effect, was fitted to the combined kinetics data. There were no treatment differences (P > 0.05) between EFF and INE cows for the variables measured, but period differences were present (P < 0.05). Fecal output tended to increase from spring to summer (P = 0.08) and for INE cattle from spring to summer (P = 0.06) but EFF cattle did not differ from spring to summer (P = 0.59). Total marker residence time in the gastrointestinal tract (RTG) was 38.3 and 40.5 ± 1.2 h for INE and EFF cows, respectively in June, and 44.0 and 42.9 ± 1.2 h for INE and EFF cows in August, increasing (P < 0.001) for INE and tending to increase for EFF (P = 0.097). Period RTG was 39.4 vs. 43.4 ± 0.8 h for June vs. August (P < 0.01). Dry matter intake (DMI) in June was 15.6 ± 1.15 kg for INE cows and 17.6 ± 1.10 kg for EFF cows (P = 0.22). August DMI was 17.0 and 16.3 ± 1.10 kg for INE and EFF cows, respectively (P = 0.67). The DOM was 58.9% vs. 53.8% ± 0.36% for June vs. August (P < 0.0001) and CP was 15.0% ± 0.23% vs. 14.2% ± 0.22% (P < 0.05). The CP in the diet declined from spring to summer for EFF cattle (P < 0.05), but not for INE cattle (P = 0.22). The compartmental mass of undigested dry matter (fill) was 6.6 vs. 8.6 ± 0.42 kg for June vs. August (P < 0.01). Bite rates increased from spring to summer (P < 0.05) and for EFF cattle (P < 0.05), but not INE cattle (P = 0.52). Grazing time tended to increase from spring to summer (P = 0.06), and for INE cattle from spring to summer (P = 0.07), but not for EFF cattle (P = 0.41). Reasonable, though slightly inflated, estimates of DMI with the pulse dose procedure were obtained, but differences in DMI for RFI in a feedlot setting did not translate to a range setting.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Idaho (US), Universidad de Sonora (MX), U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.