Misleading information visualisations as a tool of info-warfare: How the same visualisations attract floating narratives of the Russia-Ukraine war parties

Using the concept of floating narratives, we examine how, in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the same misleading information visualization (Misinfovis) on Western social platforms holds comment–narratives in favour of both war parties, independent of the visualization’s original stance, confirming that citizens generally use Misinfovis as carriers of different meanings tied to their different visions of the world. At the same time, this paper extends prior knowledge by showing the dynamics on a hitherto understudied type of content, how it appears and varies across social platforms. Furthermore, it nuances how some citizens seem to favour intellectual–group over ally–group belonging, by being skeptical despite a general overrepresentation of opinionated comments. In information warfare, these dynamics, despite clearly mobilizing, might risk backfiring when propagating Misinfovis accross different social media platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
First Monday
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v30i12.13889
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misleading information visualisations as a tool of info-warfare: How the same visualisations attract floating narratives of the Russia-Ukraine war parties

Anja Bechmann, Elena Aversa
First Monday
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Misleading information visualisations as a tool of info-warfare: How the same visualisations attract floating narratives of the Russia-Ukraine war parties

Anja Bechmann, Elena Aversa
article en

Abstract

Using the concept of floating narratives, we examine how, in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the same misleading information visualization (Misinfovis) on Western social platforms holds comment–narratives in favour of both war parties, independent of the visualization’s original stance, confirming that citizens generally use Misinfovis as carriers of different meanings tied to their different visions of the world. At the same time, this paper extends prior knowledge by showing the dynamics on a hitherto understudied type of content, how it appears and varies across social platforms. Furthermore, it nuances how some citizens seem to favour intellectual–group over ally–group belonging, by being skeptical despite a general overrepresentation of opinionated comments. In information warfare, these dynamics, despite clearly mobilizing, might risk backfiring when propagating Misinfovis accross different social media platforms.

First Monday
Aarhus University (DK), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Misleading information visualisations as a tool of info-warfare: How the same visualisations attract floating narratives of the Russia-Ukraine war parties — Anja Bechmann, Elena Aversa · First Monday (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS