Follow the Tide? Firms’ exploration and spatial competition in the product space

How do firms respond to their competitors' exploration? Prior literature has mostly drawn on vicarious learning to argue that firms will simply follow their competitors to explore. While plausible, however, it overlooks the directions toward which competitors pursue relative to focal firms. Because exploration is defined from the viewpoint of a given firm, competitors' exploration is not necessarily considered exploratory by the focal firm. Emphasizing the spatial competition perspective, we maintain that competitors may explore away from or closer towards a firm's position, which can largely shape the effect of competitors' exploration on its own exploration. By analyzing the product market repositioning of U.S. firms from 1997 to 2017, we find evidence supporting spatial competition. Competitors' exploration is more likely to drive a firm to explore when these competitors converge towards its market position (i.e., competitive convergence ). We also find that firms engage in more exploration when competitors' exploration is accompanied by greater competitor churn . These findings extend understanding of how firms strategize their exploration and handle spatial competition in the product space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Long Range Planning
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102602
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Follow the Tide? Firms’ exploration and spatial competition in the product space

Prakash Raj Paudel, Pengfei Wang
Long Range Planning
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Follow the Tide? Firms’ exploration and spatial competition in the product space

Prakash Raj Paudel, Pengfei Wang
article en

Abstract

How do firms respond to their competitors' exploration? Prior literature has mostly drawn on vicarious learning to argue that firms will simply follow their competitors to explore. While plausible, however, it overlooks the directions toward which competitors pursue relative to focal firms. Because exploration is defined from the viewpoint of a given firm, competitors' exploration is not necessarily considered exploratory by the focal firm. Emphasizing the spatial competition perspective, we maintain that competitors may explore away from or closer towards a firm's position, which can largely shape the effect of competitors' exploration on its own exploration. By analyzing the product market repositioning of U.S. firms from 1997 to 2017, we find evidence supporting spatial competition. Competitors' exploration is more likely to drive a firm to explore when these competitors converge towards its market position (i.e., competitive convergence ). We also find that firms engage in more exploration when competitors' exploration is accompanied by greater competitor churn . These findings extend understanding of how firms strategize their exploration and handle spatial competition in the product space.

Long Range PlanningVol. 59(1)
BI Norwegian Business School (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Follow the Tide? Firms’ exploration and spatial competition in the product space — Prakash Raj Paudel, Pengfei Wang · Long Range Planning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS