Agri-Photovoltaic technology allows dual use of land for tomato production and electricity generation

Agri-Photovoltaic (APV) systems combine electricity generation and agricultural production on the same land. The physiological impacts of the shading imposed on crops cultivated under such systems are not fully understood. This study evaluated the impact of APV shading on tomato physiology and productivity through two field experiments conducted in 2022 and 2023 at Bar Ilan University, Israel. Processing tomato plants (Heinz 1648, Heinz 4107) were grown in seven north-south oriented rows (T1-T7) situated between two photovoltaic (PV) panel arrays. The arrays consisted of 24 east-west-facing, single axis sun-tracking PV modules installed 1.7 m above the ground. Fruits were harvested 95-98 days after planting. Results demonstrated a strong positive correlation between total photosynthetic irradiance and tomato productivity. Shading imposed by the PV modules reduced chlorophyll content, total biomass, fruit yield, and fruit quality. Plants in the central row T4, receiving highest light availability within the APV system (1.96% less light compared to adjacent open fields), served as a control. Plants grown directly under the PV modules in rows T1 and T7 experienced the strongest shading and recorded the greatest yield losses (42% and 57%, respectively). Plants in rows with moderate shading T2 and T6 had yield losses of 13% and 20%, respectively, while plants in rows receiving near-full sunlight (T3 and T5) exhibited minimal losses (0% and 6%, respectively). Total fruit yield loss across all seven rows was 19.4% compared to conventional cultivation. Reducing the number of rows between PV modules from seven to six or five decreased yield losses to 13.0% and 7.2%, respectively, and improved the land equivalent ratio (LER). The PV systems generated ~ 29,000 kWh/1000 m<sup>2</sup> per growing season and ~ 70,000 kWh/1000 m<sup>2</sup> during the offseason. Notably, the annual net profit from tomato production under APV was 9.54 times higher than conventional agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27602-9
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agri-Photovoltaic technology allows dual use of land for tomato production and electricity generation

Yigal Cohen, Yariv Ben Naim, Chanani Ladell
Scientific Reports
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Agri-Photovoltaic technology allows dual use of land for tomato production and electricity generation

Yigal Cohen, Yariv Ben Naim, Chanani Ladell
article en

Abstract

Agri-Photovoltaic (APV) systems combine electricity generation and agricultural production on the same land. The physiological impacts of the shading imposed on crops cultivated under such systems are not fully understood. This study evaluated the impact of APV shading on tomato physiology and productivity through two field experiments conducted in 2022 and 2023 at Bar Ilan University, Israel. Processing tomato plants (Heinz 1648, Heinz 4107) were grown in seven north-south oriented rows (T1-T7) situated between two photovoltaic (PV) panel arrays. The arrays consisted of 24 east-west-facing, single axis sun-tracking PV modules installed 1.7 m above the ground. Fruits were harvested 95-98 days after planting. Results demonstrated a strong positive correlation between total photosynthetic irradiance and tomato productivity. Shading imposed by the PV modules reduced chlorophyll content, total biomass, fruit yield, and fruit quality. Plants in the central row T4, receiving highest light availability within the APV system (1.96% less light compared to adjacent open fields), served as a control. Plants grown directly under the PV modules in rows T1 and T7 experienced the strongest shading and recorded the greatest yield losses (42% and 57%, respectively). Plants in rows with moderate shading T2 and T6 had yield losses of 13% and 20%, respectively, while plants in rows receiving near-full sunlight (T3 and T5) exhibited minimal losses (0% and 6%, respectively). Total fruit yield loss across all seven rows was 19.4% compared to conventional cultivation. Reducing the number of rows between PV modules from seven to six or five decreased yield losses to 13.0% and 7.2%, respectively, and improved the land equivalent ratio (LER). The PV systems generated ~ 29,000 kWh/1000 m<sup>2</sup> per growing season and ~ 70,000 kWh/1000 m<sup>2</sup> during the offseason. Notably, the annual net profit from tomato production under APV was 9.54 times higher than conventional agriculture.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Alzheimer's Association of Israel (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.