Eye of the Beholder: Towards Measuring Visualization Complexity

Constructing expressive and legible visualizations is a key activity for visualization designers. While numerous design guidelines exist, research on how specific graphical features affect perceived visual complexity remains limited. In this paper, we report on a crowdsourced study to collect human ratings of perceived complexity for diverse visualizations. Using these ratings as ground truth, we then evaluated three methods to estimate this perceived complexity: image analysis metrics, multilinear regression using manually coded visualization features, and automated feature extraction using a large language model (LLM). Image complexity metrics showed no correlation with human-perceived visualization complexity. Manual feature coding produced a reasonable predictive model but required substantial effort. In contrast, a zero-shot LLM (GPT-4o mini) demonstrated strong capabilities in both rating complexity and extracting relevant features. Our findings suggest that visualization complexity is truly in the eye of the beholder, yet can be effectively approximated using zero-shot LLM prompting, offering a scalable approach for evaluating the complexity of visualizations. The dataset and code for the study and data analysis can be found at https://osf.io/w85a4/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2025.3634789
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eye of the Beholder: Towards Measuring Visualization Complexity

Niklas Elmqvist, Johannes Ellemose
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Eye of the Beholder: Towards Measuring Visualization Complexity

Niklas Elmqvist, Johannes Ellemose
article en

Abstract

Constructing expressive and legible visualizations is a key activity for visualization designers. While numerous design guidelines exist, research on how specific graphical features affect perceived visual complexity remains limited. In this paper, we report on a crowdsourced study to collect human ratings of perceived complexity for diverse visualizations. Using these ratings as ground truth, we then evaluated three methods to estimate this perceived complexity: image analysis metrics, multilinear regression using manually coded visualization features, and automated feature extraction using a large language model (LLM). Image complexity metrics showed no correlation with human-perceived visualization complexity. Manual feature coding produced a reasonable predictive model but required substantial effort. In contrast, a zero-shot LLM (GPT-4o mini) demonstrated strong capabilities in both rating complexity and extracting relevant features. Our findings suggest that visualization complexity is truly in the eye of the beholder, yet can be effectively approximated using zero-shot LLM prompting, offering a scalable approach for evaluating the complexity of visualizations. The dataset and code for the study and data analysis can be found at https://osf.io/w85a4/.

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsVol. 32(1)
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Eye of the Beholder: Towards Measuring Visualization Complexity — Niklas Elmqvist, Johannes Ellemose · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS