A comparative evaluation of organizational models of physiotherapy through measures reported by patients

<b>Background:</b> Identifying the value and quality of organisational models supports the performance of the overall healthcare system and the effectiveness of its processes.<b>Purpose:</b> Based on an organizational case of physiotherapy care delivery, this study compares a traditional organizational model with the most recent fast-track approach within the total hip replacement (THR) surgery pathway.<b>Research Design:</b> Through a Propensity Score Matching (PSM) application, the study aims to analysing the impact of two different models on patient-reported outcomes.<b>Study Sample:</b> Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data collected between 2018 and 2023 through the PROMs Observatory in the Tuscany region (Italy) were used.<b>Results:</b> The results, based on 417 responses, suggest that the two organizational models produce equivalent outcomes reported by patients' voices at different timepoints, while the models have different organizational characteristics that result in increased allocative value in terms of shorter length of stay (LOS) and associated reduced resource use.<b>Conclusions:</b> From a Lean Management perspective, the managers' decision-making process is supported by evidence on the adoption of the most valuable organizational model using both clinical and organizational data from the patient's point of view.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Services Management Research
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848251393487
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative evaluation of organizational models of physiotherapy through measures reported by patients

Alessandra Da Ros, Giaele Moretti, Francesca Pennucci, Sabina De Rosis
Health Services Management Research
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

A comparative evaluation of organizational models of physiotherapy through measures reported by patients

Alessandra Da Ros, Giaele Moretti, Francesca Pennucci, Sabina De Rosis
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Identifying the value and quality of organisational models supports the performance of the overall healthcare system and the effectiveness of its processes.<b>Purpose:</b> Based on an organizational case of physiotherapy care delivery, this study compares a traditional organizational model with the most recent fast-track approach within the total hip replacement (THR) surgery pathway.<b>Research Design:</b> Through a Propensity Score Matching (PSM) application, the study aims to analysing the impact of two different models on patient-reported outcomes.<b>Study Sample:</b> Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data collected between 2018 and 2023 through the PROMs Observatory in the Tuscany region (Italy) were used.<b>Results:</b> The results, based on 417 responses, suggest that the two organizational models produce equivalent outcomes reported by patients' voices at different timepoints, while the models have different organizational characteristics that result in increased allocative value in terms of shorter length of stay (LOS) and associated reduced resource use.<b>Conclusions:</b> From a Lean Management perspective, the managers' decision-making process is supported by evidence on the adoption of the most valuable organizational model using both clinical and organizational data from the patient's point of view.

Health Services Management Research
University of Verona (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), University of Reggio Calabria (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.