Examination of undergraduate learning assistants’ science communication and science teaching approaches

Undergraduate learning assistants (ULAs) are a tool to help increase the inclusivity and success of large-enrollment STEM courses for all students. ULAs are trained in inclusive pedagogy but are generally not trained in inclusive approaches to science communication with the students they are teaching. In this study, we interviewed ULAs regarding their science teaching and science communication approaches and thematically analyzed those interviews using deductive thematic analysis based on theories in science communication and discourse analysis. We found that ULAs are generally using inclusive communication tactics such as connection with their students but using deficit-based rather than asset-based perspectives and goals toward their students. This highlights the opportunity to train ULAs in deficit versus inclusive science communication as a tool to increase their ability to utilize inclusive, asset-based perspectives and approaches with their students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00254-25
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of undergraduate learning assistants’ science communication and science teaching approaches

Nicole Kelp, Madelyn Spengler
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Examination of undergraduate learning assistants’ science communication and science teaching approaches

Nicole Kelp, Madelyn Spengler
article en

Abstract

Undergraduate learning assistants (ULAs) are a tool to help increase the inclusivity and success of large-enrollment STEM courses for all students. ULAs are trained in inclusive pedagogy but are generally not trained in inclusive approaches to science communication with the students they are teaching. In this study, we interviewed ULAs regarding their science teaching and science communication approaches and thematically analyzed those interviews using deductive thematic analysis based on theories in science communication and discourse analysis. We found that ULAs are generally using inclusive communication tactics such as connection with their students but using deficit-based rather than asset-based perspectives and goals toward their students. This highlights the opportunity to train ULAs in deficit versus inclusive science communication as a tool to increase their ability to utilize inclusive, asset-based perspectives and approaches with their students.

Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examination of undergraduate learning assistants’ science communication and science teaching approaches — Nicole Kelp, Madelyn Spengler · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS