Demand Meets Supply: The <scp>ESG</scp> Impact of Green Procurement and Green Subsidy

ABSTRACT Drawing on China's policy practices under the “dual carbon” goal, this study examines how green procurement (GP), a demand‐side policy, and green subsidies (GS), a supply‐side policy, jointly affect corporate ESG performance. Using panel data of A‐share listed industrial firms from 2015 to 2022 and a two‐way fixed effects model, the findings show: (1) the GP–GS policy mix significantly enhances ESG performance through complementary “market‐locking” and “resource‐matching” effects; (2) mechanism analysis identifies three channels—greater information transparency, stronger market competition, and higher green innovation; and (3) heterogeneity tests reveal stronger impacts among heavily polluting firms and in regions with robust institutional environments. By moving beyond single‐policy analyses, this study provides evidence on the synergistic optimization of demand‐ and supply‐side environmental policies and offers micro‐level insights to refine China's green governance toolkit and strengthen ESG drivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.70056
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demand Meets Supply: The ESG Impact of Green Procurement and Green Subsidy

Lei Cheng, Meilin Zhao, Xiaohong Wang
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Demand Meets Supply: The ESG Impact of Green Procurement and Green Subsidy

Lei Cheng, Meilin Zhao, Xiaohong Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on China's policy practices under the “dual carbon” goal, this study examines how green procurement (GP), a demand‐side policy, and green subsidies (GS), a supply‐side policy, jointly affect corporate ESG performance. Using panel data of A‐share listed industrial firms from 2015 to 2022 and a two‐way fixed effects model, the findings show: (1) the GP–GS policy mix significantly enhances ESG performance through complementary “market‐locking” and “resource‐matching” effects; (2) mechanism analysis identifies three channels—greater information transparency, stronger market competition, and higher green innovation; and (3) heterogeneity tests reveal stronger impacts among heavily polluting firms and in regions with robust institutional environments. By moving beyond single‐policy analyses, this study provides evidence on the synergistic optimization of demand‐ and supply‐side environmental policies and offers micro‐level insights to refine China's green governance toolkit and strengthen ESG drivers.

Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Demand Meets Supply: The <scp>ESG</scp> Impact of Green Procurement and Green Subsidy — Lei Cheng, Meilin Zhao, et al. · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS