Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under the European Green Deal—regulatory readiness or pressure for companies?

The European Green Deal, popular for its "2050 climate neutrality" target, also postulates the "zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment", supported through the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). The CSS mentions Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), calling for the integration of safety and sustainability into innovation. Developing the SSbD framework further is a key action enabling both CSS objectives and the broader Green Deal ambitions. Yet, SSbD's complexity and data demands are seen by many companies as burdensome, while the benefits of SSbD adoption remain unclear. Therefore, this study examines SSbD's role in "regulatory readiness", ie, proactive development of novel chemicals, materials, and products for compliance before market entry and for adaptability to future regulations. By analyzing 15 EU policies (prioritized through industry feedback) against 15 SSbD components, this study finds a 64% overlap, ie, many mandates for SSbD components are observed within the analyzed legislation. The findings of this study inform recommendations for industry and policymakers to foster industrial competitiveness in the EU. Companies are recommended to leverage SSbD for early regulatory readiness, internalize SSbD's "fail early and fail cheap" philosophy, and invest in SSbD capacity building. Policymakers are recommended to incentivize corporate SSbD adoption, explicitly integrate SSbD into future legislation, and invest in research to address critical gaps in safety and sustainability sciences to strengthen SSbD further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf188
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under the European Green Deal—regulatory readiness or pressure for companies?

Akshat Sudheshwar, Lya G. Soeteman‐Hernández, Bernd Nowack, Johanna Scheper et al.
2 citations
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
1.72
article

Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under the European Green Deal—regulatory readiness or pressure for companies?

Akshat Sudheshwar, Lya G. Soeteman‐Hernández, Bernd Nowack, Johanna Scheper, Andreas Falk, Klaus Kümmerer, Jochen Markard, Claudia Som, Zhanyun Wang, Christina Apel, Annika Batel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The European Green Deal, popular for its "2050 climate neutrality" target, also postulates the "zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment", supported through the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). The CSS mentions Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), calling for the integration of safety and sustainability into innovation. Developing the SSbD framework further is a key action enabling both CSS objectives and the broader Green Deal ambitions. Yet, SSbD's complexity and data demands are seen by many companies as burdensome, while the benefits of SSbD adoption remain unclear. Therefore, this study examines SSbD's role in "regulatory readiness", ie, proactive development of novel chemicals, materials, and products for compliance before market entry and for adaptability to future regulations. By analyzing 15 EU policies (prioritized through industry feedback) against 15 SSbD components, this study finds a 64% overlap, ie, many mandates for SSbD components are observed within the analyzed legislation. The findings of this study inform recommendations for industry and policymakers to foster industrial competitiveness in the EU. Companies are recommended to leverage SSbD for early regulatory readiness, internalize SSbD's "fail early and fail cheap" philosophy, and invest in SSbD capacity building. Policymakers are recommended to incentivize corporate SSbD adoption, explicitly integrate SSbD into future legislation, and invest in research to address critical gaps in safety and sustainability sciences to strengthen SSbD further.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), BASF (United States) (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Bioforschung Austria (AT), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), BioNanoNet (AT), BASF (Germany) (DE), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
European Chemical Industry Council, European Commission, Stanford Institute for Research in the Social Sciences, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.