Analysis of Internet Access in Australia: A Household Panel Study Examining the Effects of Mental Health and Economic Disadvantage

ABSTRACT Digital mental health (MH) services can improve treatment accessibility, but people with poor MH often have lower internet access (IA) due to socioeconomic factors. As IA becomes essential, we examine if poor MH and socioeconomic status still hinder IA over 12 years in Australia. The HILDA survey collects annual data on demographics, health (including MH via the Mental Health Inventory‐5), IA, employment and financial circumstances from a nationally representative panel. Our sample included 14,955 individuals from 2011 to 2022, using polynomial regression models and margins plots to explore the link between IA, poor MH and household income. While the IA gap by MH status narrowed between 2011 and 2022, socioeconomic disadvantages (incomplete secondary education, low income and financial hardship) largely explained the lower IA rates. In 2022, there was a 9% IA rate difference between the lowest and highest income quintiles. Policymakers and healthcare services must address ongoing socioeconomic inequalities in IA to ensure digital platforms can provide universal access to MH services and treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70087
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Internet Access in Australia: A Household Panel Study Examining the Effects of Mental Health and Economic Disadvantage

Peter Butterworth, Lay San Too, Lloyd Leach, Devan Nambiar
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Analysis of Internet Access in Australia: A Household Panel Study Examining the Effects of Mental Health and Economic Disadvantage

Peter Butterworth, Lay San Too, Lloyd Leach, Devan Nambiar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digital mental health (MH) services can improve treatment accessibility, but people with poor MH often have lower internet access (IA) due to socioeconomic factors. As IA becomes essential, we examine if poor MH and socioeconomic status still hinder IA over 12 years in Australia. The HILDA survey collects annual data on demographics, health (including MH via the Mental Health Inventory‐5), IA, employment and financial circumstances from a nationally representative panel. Our sample included 14,955 individuals from 2011 to 2022, using polynomial regression models and margins plots to explore the link between IA, poor MH and household income. While the IA gap by MH status narrowed between 2011 and 2022, socioeconomic disadvantages (incomplete secondary education, low income and financial hardship) largely explained the lower IA rates. In 2022, there was a 9% IA rate difference between the lowest and highest income quintiles. Policymakers and healthcare services must address ongoing socioeconomic inequalities in IA to ensure digital platforms can provide universal access to MH services and treatment.

Australian Journal of Social Issues
Australian National University (AU), Deakin University (AU), Melbourne Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.