Two decades of changes in the global network of illegal wildlife trade

Understanding how illegal wildlife trade (IWT) has changed over time is fundamental for biodiversity conservation; however, knowledge of the network remains limited. We used TRAFFIC's IWT dataset, legal trade data from the CITES legal wildlife trade database as a benchmark, and network analysis to identify changes in IWT from 2000 to 2022. The center of IWT shifted from Europe to Asia around the 2010s, especially through the direct flow of some species, such as rhinoceroses and pangolins, from Africa to Asia and within Asia. Despite the prominence of Africa and Asia, the network remained global and involved players on all continents, as demonstrated by a low tendency of high-degree nodes to connect to each other and a large core of about 50% of the nodes. The IWT network expanded significantly from 49 countries in 2000 to 110 countries in 2018. There was a similarly dramatic increase in the number of trade connections, from 52 edges in 2000 to 266 in 2018, highlighting the growing complexity of the trade. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the IWT network exhibited resiliency; there was only a gradual decline in participating countries from 90 in 2020 to 72 in 2021. Also, during the pandemic, network clustering and geodesic distance were maintained, underscoring IWT's adaptability despite global disruptions. These network properties explain the persistent nature of IWT and suggest constant monitoring is necessary to keep up with changes in the network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70196
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two decades of changes in the global network of illegal wildlife trade

Jia Hao Tow, Jason Chon Jun Choo, Serene Chng, Madhu Rao et al.
Conservation Biology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Two decades of changes in the global network of illegal wildlife trade

Jia Hao Tow, Jason Chon Jun Choo, Serene Chng, Madhu Rao, L. Román Carrasco, Thi Phuong Le Nghiem
article en

Abstract

Understanding how illegal wildlife trade (IWT) has changed over time is fundamental for biodiversity conservation; however, knowledge of the network remains limited. We used TRAFFIC's IWT dataset, legal trade data from the CITES legal wildlife trade database as a benchmark, and network analysis to identify changes in IWT from 2000 to 2022. The center of IWT shifted from Europe to Asia around the 2010s, especially through the direct flow of some species, such as rhinoceroses and pangolins, from Africa to Asia and within Asia. Despite the prominence of Africa and Asia, the network remained global and involved players on all continents, as demonstrated by a low tendency of high-degree nodes to connect to each other and a large core of about 50% of the nodes. The IWT network expanded significantly from 49 countries in 2000 to 110 countries in 2018. There was a similarly dramatic increase in the number of trade connections, from 52 edges in 2000 to 266 in 2018, highlighting the growing complexity of the trade. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the IWT network exhibited resiliency; there was only a gradual decline in participating countries from 90 in 2020 to 72 in 2021. Also, during the pandemic, network clustering and geodesic distance were maintained, underscoring IWT's adaptability despite global disruptions. These network properties explain the persistent nature of IWT and suggest constant monitoring is necessary to keep up with changes in the network.

Conservation Biology
Wildlife Conservation Society (US), National University of Singapore (SG), Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom (GB), Malaysia University of Science and Technology (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two decades of changes in the global network of illegal wildlife trade — Jia Hao Tow, Jason Chon Jun Choo, et al. · Conservation Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS