Scaffolding artifact in entrepreneurship: A design science approach

Entrepreneurship is increasingly understood as a design-oriented process in which individuals and teams construct opportunities and navigate uncertainty through the iterative use of artifacts. This paper introduces scaffolding artifacts (SAFs) as a distinct and under-theorized class of entrepreneurial tools that provide temporary, structured support for decision-making, learning, and venture development. Drawing on Design Science Research (DSR), SAFs are conceptualized as theory-informed, generalizable frameworks or methods that, when instantiated in specific contexts, serve as cognitive and procedural supports to reduce complexity, enhance agency, and guide entrepreneurial action. SAFs are differentiated from venturing artifacts (VAFs) by their function: while VAFs represent concrete outputs of entrepreneurial work (e.g., product versions, landing pages), SAFs scaffold the venture-creation process itself without predetermining outcomes. This paper contributes to construct clarity by extending scaffolding theory from pedagogic psychology into entrepreneurship, introducing SAFs as adaptive supports that guide entrepreneurial cognition and action. It offers a unified definition of SAFs, distinguishes them from VAFs, applies the type–token distinction to explain contextual instantiation, and uses Design Science Research to frame their intentional development. Well-known tools such as the Business Model Canvas, Design Thinking, and the van Westendorp price sensitivity meter are discussed as exemplars of SAFs in practice. To support design and validation, the paper introduces the Design Science Canvas, an operational framework that structures the iterative development and empirical evaluation of SAFs. As digitalization and AI reshape entrepreneurial ecosystems, the study highlights the potential and risks of algorithmic SAFs, emphasizing the importance of human-centered, adaptive use. By advancing the theoretical foundations and methodological pathways for developing SAFs, this study bridges entrepreneurship research and design practice. It offers actionable insights for scholars, educators, policymakers, and entrepreneurs seeking to foster resilient, reflective, and opportunity-driven venture creation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Venturing Design
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvd.2025.100035
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaffolding artifact in entrepreneurship: A design science approach

Orestis Terzidis, Faisal Saeed Malik
Journal of Business Venturing Design
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Scaffolding artifact in entrepreneurship: A design science approach

Orestis Terzidis, Faisal Saeed Malik
article en

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is increasingly understood as a design-oriented process in which individuals and teams construct opportunities and navigate uncertainty through the iterative use of artifacts. This paper introduces scaffolding artifacts (SAFs) as a distinct and under-theorized class of entrepreneurial tools that provide temporary, structured support for decision-making, learning, and venture development. Drawing on Design Science Research (DSR), SAFs are conceptualized as theory-informed, generalizable frameworks or methods that, when instantiated in specific contexts, serve as cognitive and procedural supports to reduce complexity, enhance agency, and guide entrepreneurial action. SAFs are differentiated from venturing artifacts (VAFs) by their function: while VAFs represent concrete outputs of entrepreneurial work (e.g., product versions, landing pages), SAFs scaffold the venture-creation process itself without predetermining outcomes. This paper contributes to construct clarity by extending scaffolding theory from pedagogic psychology into entrepreneurship, introducing SAFs as adaptive supports that guide entrepreneurial cognition and action. It offers a unified definition of SAFs, distinguishes them from VAFs, applies the type–token distinction to explain contextual instantiation, and uses Design Science Research to frame their intentional development. Well-known tools such as the Business Model Canvas, Design Thinking, and the van Westendorp price sensitivity meter are discussed as exemplars of SAFs in practice. To support design and validation, the paper introduces the Design Science Canvas, an operational framework that structures the iterative development and empirical evaluation of SAFs. As digitalization and AI reshape entrepreneurial ecosystems, the study highlights the potential and risks of algorithmic SAFs, emphasizing the importance of human-centered, adaptive use. By advancing the theoretical foundations and methodological pathways for developing SAFs, this study bridges entrepreneurship research and design practice. It offers actionable insights for scholars, educators, policymakers, and entrepreneurs seeking to foster resilient, reflective, and opportunity-driven venture creation.

Journal of Business Venturing DesignVol. 5
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.