The Common Good and Voter Polarization

Abstract Do voters see democracy entirely in spatial terms, as a tradeoff of conflicting interests, or do they also view it as a search for the “common good”, as some democracy theorists have long conjectured? We develop a model in which voters have preferences over both common-good and spatial payoffs, and provide a novel method to disentangle the two. Estimating the model on California ballot propositions from 1986 to 2020, we find that 74% of voters placed significant weight on the common good and that partisan polarization roughly doubled over the time period, mainly due to Democrats drifting left.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Economic Association
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaf059
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Common Good and Voter Polarization

John G. Matsusaka, Chad Kendall John G Matsusaka
Journal of the European Economic Association
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

The Common Good and Voter Polarization

John G. Matsusaka, Chad Kendall John G Matsusaka
article en

Abstract

Abstract Do voters see democracy entirely in spatial terms, as a tradeoff of conflicting interests, or do they also view it as a search for the “common good”, as some democracy theorists have long conjectured? We develop a model in which voters have preferences over both common-good and spatial payoffs, and provide a novel method to disentangle the two. Estimating the model on California ballot propositions from 1986 to 2020, we find that 74% of voters placed significant weight on the common good and that partisan polarization roughly doubled over the time period, mainly due to Democrats drifting left.

Journal of the European Economic Association
University of Southern California (US), University of Miami (US), California Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.