Planetary Health in Health Guidelines and Health Technology Assessments: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT Introduction Individual human health is inextricably linked to planetary health, which refers to the health of human civilization and the natural systems on which it depends. These systems are captured by the nine planetary boundaries which together define a safe operating space for humanity. The health sector contributes to the transgression of these boundaries, thereby jeopardizing both individual and planetary health. However, there is a growing interest in the health sector in incorporating the preservation of planetary boundaries into health guidelines and health technology assessments (HTAs), which synthesize evidence and guide healthcare decisions. Methods This scoping review aims to describe methodological guidance and considerations for incorporating planetary health in health guidelines and HTAs. We conducted a scoping review adhering to the JBI methodology including articles from several databases since inception until September 2023. We used narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics to describe eligible studies. Results Of the 38 included studies, 14 (37%) were commentaries, six (16%) were methodological papers, and four (10·5%) were health guidelines. Included studies focused primarily on greenhouse gas emissions as an outcome. The included health guidelines were rated at a median of 52% (range: 16% to 67%) on AGREE II for methodological quality. Discussion Key findings pertain to the normative significance of planetary health in guidelines and HTAs, scope and quality of included studies, inconsistencies in methods, and challenges in implementation. These findings will inform future Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidance on planetary health. Registration A protocol of this scoping review was registered in Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/3jmsa ) and published in the journal Systematic Reviews (10.1186/s13643‐024‐02577‐2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gin2.70056
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planetary Health in Health Guidelines and Health Technology Assessments: A Scoping Review

KM Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, Maheen Raja, Hendrik Napierala, Fiona A. Miller et al.
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Planetary Health in Health Guidelines and Health Technology Assessments: A Scoping Review

KM Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, Maheen Raja, Hendrik Napierala, Fiona A. Miller, Laura Jewell, Ruben Heuer, Karolina Scahill, Grigorios I. Leontiadis, Rebecca L. Morgan, Alina Herrmann, Pakeezah Saadat, Thomas Piggott, Holger J. Schünemann, Andrea Darzi, Charlotte T. J. Michels, Ignacio Neumann
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Individual human health is inextricably linked to planetary health, which refers to the health of human civilization and the natural systems on which it depends. These systems are captured by the nine planetary boundaries which together define a safe operating space for humanity. The health sector contributes to the transgression of these boundaries, thereby jeopardizing both individual and planetary health. However, there is a growing interest in the health sector in incorporating the preservation of planetary boundaries into health guidelines and health technology assessments (HTAs), which synthesize evidence and guide healthcare decisions. Methods This scoping review aims to describe methodological guidance and considerations for incorporating planetary health in health guidelines and HTAs. We conducted a scoping review adhering to the JBI methodology including articles from several databases since inception until September 2023. We used narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics to describe eligible studies. Results Of the 38 included studies, 14 (37%) were commentaries, six (16%) were methodological papers, and four (10·5%) were health guidelines. Included studies focused primarily on greenhouse gas emissions as an outcome. The included health guidelines were rated at a median of 52% (range: 16% to 67%) on AGREE II for methodological quality. Discussion Key findings pertain to the normative significance of planetary health in guidelines and HTAs, scope and quality of included studies, inconsistencies in methods, and challenges in implementation. These findings will inform future Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidance on planetary health. Registration A protocol of this scoping review was registered in Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/3jmsa ) and published in the journal Systematic Reviews (10.1186/s13643‐024‐02577‐2).

Clinical and Public Health GuidelinesVol. 3(1)
Humanitas University (IT), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Queen's University (CA), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), San Sebastián University (CL), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (NL), Queens University (BD), Kungälvs Sjukhus (SE), Institute for Work & Health (CA), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Impact (CA), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Case Western Reserve University (US), McMaster University (CA), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.