A U.S. Scientific Community Vision for Sustained Earth Observations of Greenhouse Gases to Support Local to Global Action

Abstract Managing carbon stocks in the land, ocean, and atmosphere under changing climate requires a globally‐integrated view of carbon cycle processes at local and regional scales. The growing Earth Observation (EO) record is the backbone of this multi‐scale system, providing local information with discrete coverage from surface measurements and regional information at global scale from satellites. Carbon flux information, anchored by inverse estimates from spaceborne Greenhouse Gas (GHG) concentrations, provides an important top‐down view of carbon emissions and sinks, but currently lacks global continuity at assessment and management scales (<100 km). Partial‐column data can help separate signals in the boundary layer from the overlying atmosphere, providing an opportunity to enhance surface sensitivity and bring flux resolution down from that of column‐integrated data (100–500 km). Based on a workshop held in September 2024, the carbon cycle community envisions a carbon observation system leveraging GHG partial columns in the lower and upper troposphere to weave together information across scales from surface and satellite EO data, and integration of top‐down/bottom‐up analyses to link process understanding to global assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AGU Advances
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025av001914
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A U.S. Scientific Community Vision for Sustained Earth Observations of Greenhouse Gases to Support Local to Global Action

James R. Holmquist, Joshua L. Laughner, Renato K. Braghiere, Brendan Keith Aidan Byrne et al.
1 citations
AGU Advances
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

A U.S. Scientific Community Vision for Sustained Earth Observations of Greenhouse Gases to Support Local to Global Action

James R. Holmquist, Joshua L. Laughner, Renato K. Braghiere, Brendan Keith Aidan Byrne, Debra Wunch, David Crisp, Michael Keller, Galen A. McKinley, Bradley Gay, Zoe Pierrat, Keith Paustian, Lisamarie Windham‐Myers, Francesca M. Hopkins, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Sasha C. Reed, Sassan Saatchi, Yinon M. Bar‐On, K. W. Bowman, Forrest M. Hoffman, Hannah Nesser, Christian Frankenberg, Gavin McNicol, A. Anthony Bloom, Natasha MacBean, Dustin Carroll, Lori Bruhwiler, Elsa M. Ordway, Benjamin Poulter, Lesley E. Ott, James B. Abshire, Abhishek Chatterjee, A. M. Fox, David Schimel, Andrew F. Feldman, Lucy R. Hutyra, Shawn Paul Serbin, Charles D. Koven, Dimitris Menemenlis, Laura Duncanson, Charles E. Miller, Anna M. Michalak, Tomohiro Oda, Junjie Liu, Hiroshi Suto, Richard A. Birdsey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Managing carbon stocks in the land, ocean, and atmosphere under changing climate requires a globally‐integrated view of carbon cycle processes at local and regional scales. The growing Earth Observation (EO) record is the backbone of this multi‐scale system, providing local information with discrete coverage from surface measurements and regional information at global scale from satellites. Carbon flux information, anchored by inverse estimates from spaceborne Greenhouse Gas (GHG) concentrations, provides an important top‐down view of carbon emissions and sinks, but currently lacks global continuity at assessment and management scales (<100 km). Partial‐column data can help separate signals in the boundary layer from the overlying atmosphere, providing an opportunity to enhance surface sensitivity and bring flux resolution down from that of column‐integrated data (100–500 km). Based on a workshop held in September 2024, the carbon cycle community envisions a carbon observation system leveraging GHG partial columns in the lower and upper troposphere to weave together information across scales from surface and satellite EO data, and integration of top‐down/bottom‐up analyses to link process understanding to global assessment.

AGU AdvancesVol. 6(6)
University of California, Riverside (US), Boston University (US), California Institute of Technology (US), Western University (CA), United States Geological Survey (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), Woodwell Climate Research Center (US), US Forest Service (US), Universities Space Research Association (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), George Mason University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Carnegie Institution for Science (US), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP), NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Quadrise Canada Corporation (Canada) (CA), Climate Centre (NL), International Institute of Tropical Forestry (PR), Spectra Research (United States) (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (US), Weizmann Institute of Science (IL), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Columbia University (US), Morgan State University (US), Colorado State University (US), Moss Landing Marine Laboratories (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.