Measurement properties of the Spanish version of assessment of survivor concerns in cancer patients

One of the main concerns for cancer patients is the progression of the disease and their health. This study sought to examine the psychometric properties, validity evidence based on relations with other variables, and factorial invariance (by sex, age, and tumor site) of the Spanish version of the Assessment of Survival Concerns (ASC). The instrument was translated into Spanish following a back-to-back translation procedure to ensure linguistic and conceptual equivalence. Participants completed the questionnaire in a paper-and-pencil format as part of a prospective, multicenter study including 1,052 patients who also completed other related psychosocial measures. The findings support the reliability and validity of the ASC scores in assessing cancer-related concerns. The ASC is a brief, unidimensional measure with acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.038, CFI = 0.998, TLI = 0.995, SRMR = 0.026). A strong invariance solution demonstrated acceptable fit across sex, age, and tumor site. The omega reliability estimate was ω = 0.83. Higher ASC scores were positively associated with greater symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress, as well as with higher physical symptom burden, indicating that patients experiencing more concern also reported worse psychological and functional outcomes. The Spanish version of the ASC provides reliable and valid scores for assessing cancer-related concerns in patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32396-x
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement properties of the Spanish version of assessment of survivor concerns in cancer patients

Caterina Calderón, María Corral, Urbano Lorenzo‐Seva, Marta Oporto Alonso et al.
Scientific Reports
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Measurement properties of the Spanish version of assessment of survivor concerns in cancer patients

Caterina Calderón, María Corral, Urbano Lorenzo‐Seva, Marta Oporto Alonso, Paula Jiménez‐Fonseca, Pere J. Ferrando
article en

Abstract

One of the main concerns for cancer patients is the progression of the disease and their health. This study sought to examine the psychometric properties, validity evidence based on relations with other variables, and factorial invariance (by sex, age, and tumor site) of the Spanish version of the Assessment of Survival Concerns (ASC). The instrument was translated into Spanish following a back-to-back translation procedure to ensure linguistic and conceptual equivalence. Participants completed the questionnaire in a paper-and-pencil format as part of a prospective, multicenter study including 1,052 patients who also completed other related psychosocial measures. The findings support the reliability and validity of the ASC scores in assessing cancer-related concerns. The ASC is a brief, unidimensional measure with acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.038, CFI = 0.998, TLI = 0.995, SRMR = 0.026). A strong invariance solution demonstrated acceptable fit across sex, age, and tumor site. The omega reliability estimate was ω = 0.83. Higher ASC scores were positively associated with greater symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress, as well as with higher physical symptom burden, indicating that patients experiencing more concern also reported worse psychological and functional outcomes. The Spanish version of the ASC provides reliable and valid scores for assessing cancer-related concerns in patients with metastatic cancer.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Universidad San Pablo CEU (ES), Hebron University (PS), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.