A deep learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data

The cell cycle is a series of regulated stages during which a cell grows, replicates its DNA, and divides. It consists of four phases - two growth phases (G1 and G2), a replication phase (S), and a division phase (M) - each characterized by distinct transcriptional programs and impacting most other cellular processes. In imaging assays, the cell cycle phase can be identified using specific cell-cycle markers. However, the use of dedicated cell-cycle markers can be impractical or even prohibitive, as they occupy fluorescent channels that may be needed for other reporters. To address this limitation we propose a method to infer the cell cycle phase from a widely used fluorescent reporter: SiR-DNA, thereby bypassing the need for phase-specific markers while leveraging information already present in common experimental setups. Our method is based on a Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE), enhanced with two auxiliary tasks: predicting the average intensity of phase-specific markers and enforcing temporal consistency through latent space regularization. The reconstruction task ensures that the latent space captures cell cycle-relevant features, while the temporal constraint promotes biological plausibility. The resulting model, CC-VAE, classifies cell cycle phases with high accuracy from widely used DNA markers and can thus be applied to high-content screening datasets not specifically designed for cell cycle analysis. CC-VAE is freely available, along with a new, publicly released dataset comprising over 600,000 labeled HeLa Kyoto nuclear images to support further development and benchmarking in the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013800
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A deep learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data

Édouard Bertrand, Florian Mueller, Thomas Walter, Thomas Bonte et al.
PLoS Computational Biology
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

A deep learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data

Édouard Bertrand, Florian Mueller, Thomas Walter, Thomas Bonte, Oriane Pourcelot, Adham Safieddine, Dominique Weil, Floric Slimani
article en

Abstract

The cell cycle is a series of regulated stages during which a cell grows, replicates its DNA, and divides. It consists of four phases - two growth phases (G1 and G2), a replication phase (S), and a division phase (M) - each characterized by distinct transcriptional programs and impacting most other cellular processes. In imaging assays, the cell cycle phase can be identified using specific cell-cycle markers. However, the use of dedicated cell-cycle markers can be impractical or even prohibitive, as they occupy fluorescent channels that may be needed for other reporters. To address this limitation we propose a method to infer the cell cycle phase from a widely used fluorescent reporter: SiR-DNA, thereby bypassing the need for phase-specific markers while leveraging information already present in common experimental setups. Our method is based on a Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE), enhanced with two auxiliary tasks: predicting the average intensity of phase-specific markers and enforcing temporal consistency through latent space regularization. The reconstruction task ensures that the latent space captures cell cycle-relevant features, while the temporal constraint promotes biological plausibility. The resulting model, CC-VAE, classifies cell cycle phases with high accuracy from widely used DNA markers and can thus be applied to high-content screening datasets not specifically designed for cell cycle analysis. CC-VAE is freely available, along with a new, publicly released dataset comprising over 600,000 labeled HeLa Kyoto nuclear images to support further development and benchmarking in the community.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 21(12)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Institut Pasteur (FR), Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (FR), Géosciences Montpellier (FR), Développement Adaptation et Vieillissement (FR), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR), Institut Curie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.