Computed tomography colonography performs poorly in detection of sessile serrated lesions

This study demonstrated that CTC has poor efficacy in detecting SSLs, irrespective of polyp size and location. Based on these findings, CTC as a substitute for colonoscopy is not advisable in patients at risk of SSLs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Medical Journal
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7109
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computed tomography colonography performs poorly in detection of sessile serrated lesions

Tim Eglinton, Simon Richards, Shiristi Kumar, E. G. Bone et al.
New Zealand Medical Journal
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Computed tomography colonography performs poorly in detection of sessile serrated lesions

Tim Eglinton, Simon Richards, Shiristi Kumar, E. G. Bone, Tamara Glyn, Andrew McCombie
article en

Abstract

This study demonstrated that CTC has poor efficacy in detecting SSLs, irrespective of polyp size and location. Based on these findings, CTC as a substitute for colonoscopy is not advisable in patients at risk of SSLs.

New Zealand Medical JournalVol. 138(1627)
University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.