Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Concise Review of Reporting Checklists and Guidelines

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into dental diagnostics, imaging and treatment planning. However, despite this growing adoption, adherence to standardised reporting frameworks remains inconsistent. Insufficient use of established checklists continues to impede reproducibility, transparency and regulatory credibility. This review systematically examines existing AI reporting frameworks relevant to dental research, mapping their methodological domains, areas of overlap and persistent implementation gaps. We analysed established medical reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare covering trials, protocols, prediction models, bias assessment, decision-support systems, imaging and systematic reviews alongside dentistry-specific checklists and ethical frameworks. While dental AI research is expanding rapidly, its reporting remains fragmented and inconsistent. Existing frameworks provide a comprehensive foundation for transparency and methodological rigour, but are underutilised. Harmonising these frameworks and promoting active adherence through journal policies, regulatory integration and quantitative compliance tracking are essential to bridge the gap between algorithmic performance and trustworthy clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2025.109322
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Concise Review of Reporting Checklists and Guidelines

Zohaib Khurshid, Thanaphum Noom Osathanon, Falk Schwendicke, Lakshman P. Samaranayake et al.
9 citations
International Dental Journal
Dental Radiography and Imaging
16.11
article

Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Concise Review of Reporting Checklists and Guidelines

Zohaib Khurshid, Thanaphum Noom Osathanon, Falk Schwendicke, Lakshman P. Samaranayake, Mohamedamin Abdullahi Shire
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into dental diagnostics, imaging and treatment planning. However, despite this growing adoption, adherence to standardised reporting frameworks remains inconsistent. Insufficient use of established checklists continues to impede reproducibility, transparency and regulatory credibility. This review systematically examines existing AI reporting frameworks relevant to dental research, mapping their methodological domains, areas of overlap and persistent implementation gaps. We analysed established medical reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare covering trials, protocols, prediction models, bias assessment, decision-support systems, imaging and systematic reviews alongside dentistry-specific checklists and ethical frameworks. While dental AI research is expanding rapidly, its reporting remains fragmented and inconsistent. Existing frameworks provide a comprehensive foundation for transparency and methodological rigour, but are underutilised. Harmonising these frameworks and promoting active adherence through journal policies, regulatory integration and quantitative compliance tracking are essential to bridge the gap between algorithmic performance and trustworthy clinical adoption.

International Dental JournalVol. 76(1)
NED University of Engineering and Technology (PK), Chulalongkorn University (TH), LMU Klinikum (DE), Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN), King Faisal University (SA), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
16.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.