“He needs to die in the hospital”: A caregiver’s distress call

The setting in which patients face the end of life (EOL) is shaped by complex, individualized needs beyond physical care. Mr. X, a man in his mid-50s with glioblastoma, endured treatment complications and progressive decline. Supportive care was engaged to manage symptoms and support his wife, Mrs. X, who was simultaneously the family's financial provider and caregiver for both her husband and their autistic adult son. As his condition worsened, she resisted hospice and code status changes, citing emotional, logistical, and financial barriers, while fiercely advocating for his wish to die in the hospital. Counseling and empathic validation helped her share her burdens and reframe her advocacy as rooted in love and grief. She ultimately consented to comfort-focused care, and Mr. X died peacefully in the hospital after a 31-day stay. This case underscores the need to integrate psychosocial factors into individualized EOL planning and to strengthen person-centered care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Palliative & Supportive Care
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951525101351
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“He needs to die in the hospital”: A caregiver’s distress call

Monica T. Agosta, Jie Min
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

“He needs to die in the hospital”: A caregiver’s distress call

Monica T. Agosta, Jie Min
article en

Abstract

The setting in which patients face the end of life (EOL) is shaped by complex, individualized needs beyond physical care. Mr. X, a man in his mid-50s with glioblastoma, endured treatment complications and progressive decline. Supportive care was engaged to manage symptoms and support his wife, Mrs. X, who was simultaneously the family's financial provider and caregiver for both her husband and their autistic adult son. As his condition worsened, she resisted hospice and code status changes, citing emotional, logistical, and financial barriers, while fiercely advocating for his wish to die in the hospital. Counseling and empathic validation helped her share her burdens and reframe her advocacy as rooted in love and grief. She ultimately consented to comfort-focused care, and Mr. X died peacefully in the hospital after a 31-day stay. This case underscores the need to integrate psychosocial factors into individualized EOL planning and to strengthen person-centered care.

Palliative & Supportive CareVol. 23
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.