High Hopes for Eternalism

Abstract In this paper, I present two puzzles that pose a challenge for semantic eternalism, i.e., the thesis that propositions do not change their truth-values over time. The puzzles concern the attitude of hope. The first one is generated by the intuitive condition for hope’s satisfaction, according to which a hope that p is satisfied at t if and only if p is true at t . The second puzzle follows from the standard assumptions about probability. I argue that proponents of semantic eternalism can solve both puzzles. Firstly, I propose an alternative account of hope’s satisfaction. The second puzzle is addressed by revisiting the link between truth and probability. My conclusion is that the case for eternalism is not yet lost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Analytica
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-025-00664-0
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Hopes for Eternalism

Jakub Węgrecki
Acta Analytica
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

High Hopes for Eternalism

Jakub Węgrecki
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I present two puzzles that pose a challenge for semantic eternalism, i.e., the thesis that propositions do not change their truth-values over time. The puzzles concern the attitude of hope. The first one is generated by the intuitive condition for hope’s satisfaction, according to which a hope that p is satisfied at t if and only if p is true at t . The second puzzle follows from the standard assumptions about probability. I argue that proponents of semantic eternalism can solve both puzzles. Firstly, I propose an alternative account of hope’s satisfaction. The second puzzle is addressed by revisiting the link between truth and probability. My conclusion is that the case for eternalism is not yet lost.

Acta Analytica
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.