Elite domination by design? Comparing the rules of the game within Parliamentary Party Groups

While there is a vibrant debate on decision-making and the degree of democracy within party organizations, scant attention has been paid to the power relations within the parties inside parliaments. This article remedies that neglect by providing the first comparative analysis of how Parliamentary Party Groups (PPGs) distribute decision-making authority. Focusing on their internal rules of procedure, we develop a multifaceted index to capture the extent to which leaders and the rank-and-file can influence group decisions. The index was subjected to an empirical examination by drawing on an original data set that includes more than 100 groups from 17 polities. We show that PPGs heavily differ in their institutional design within and across countries. Moreover, elite domination is related to a lower level of regulation, indicating that institutionalizing power counteracts elite politics. In line with party research, we found variation across party families with left-leaning groups exhibiting more participation-friendly rulebooks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Political Science Review
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121251392195
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elite domination by design? Comparing the rules of the game within Parliamentary Party Groups

Oliver Kannenberg, Danny Schindler
International Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Elite domination by design? Comparing the rules of the game within Parliamentary Party Groups

Oliver Kannenberg, Danny Schindler
article en

Abstract

While there is a vibrant debate on decision-making and the degree of democracy within party organizations, scant attention has been paid to the power relations within the parties inside parliaments. This article remedies that neglect by providing the first comparative analysis of how Parliamentary Party Groups (PPGs) distribute decision-making authority. Focusing on their internal rules of procedure, we develop a multifaceted index to capture the extent to which leaders and the rank-and-file can influence group decisions. The index was subjected to an empirical examination by drawing on an original data set that includes more than 100 groups from 17 polities. We show that PPGs heavily differ in their institutional design within and across countries. Moreover, elite domination is related to a lower level of regulation, indicating that institutionalizing power counteracts elite politics. In line with party research, we found variation across party families with left-leaning groups exhibiting more participation-friendly rulebooks.

International Political Science Review
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Elite domination by design? Comparing the rules of the game within Parliamentary Party Groups — Oliver Kannenberg, Danny Schindler · International Political Science Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS