Clinical features and subgroup patterns in elderly and super-elderly TMD patients

This cross-sectional study compares TMD signs and symptoms in patients aged ≥ 65 (elderly) and ≥ 85 (super-elderly) with younger age groups. Additionally, this study sought to identify the key factors contributing to increased pain intensity in elderly and super-elderly patients with TMD. A total of 4,661 patients with TMD (mean age = 42.22 ± 20.08 years, 3069 women and 1592 men) were analyzed, categorized into six age groups, including those aged 65–74, 75–84, and 85 + years. The clinical characteristics, pain intensity (VAS), and TMD subgroup distribution were examined. Generalized linear models and 2D/3D visualizations were used to explore the correlations and multivariable relationships. Of the 4,661 patients aged 7–113 years, 16.8% were elderly and 1.1% were super-elderly. The female-to-male ratios in the elderly group were 1.93:1 and 1.78:1, with females being predominant across all age groups. Elderly groups, including those aged 65–74 (3.92 ± 2.49), 75–84 (3.94 ± 2.73), and 85 + years (3.92 ± 2.49), had significantly higher VAS scores compared to younger age groups (p < 0.001), indicating moderate pain levels. Maximum mouth opening values were significantly smaller in the 75–84 (38.81 ± 10.79 mm) and 85 + groups (38.08 ± 12.79 mm) compared to younger groups (p < 0.001). Arthralgia was one of the most prevalent TMD subgroups in both elderly (58.2%) and super-elderly (50.0%) patients. Degenerative joint disease was more prevalent in the super-elderly group (48.0%) than in the elderly group (37.9%) (P < 0.05). Chronic TMD was most prevalent in the 0–19 years group (50.3%), followed by the super-elderly group (44.0%) (p < 0.001). GLM analysis showed that TMJ pain (B = 1.324, p < 0.001), TMJ noise (B = 0.757, p < 0.001), and age (B = 0.014, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VAS scores, whereas increases in CMO (B = -0.011, p < 0.001) were associated with lower VAS scores. In the super-elderly group, the VAS score was also significantly associated with degenerative joint disease. The 2D and 3D visualizations revealed a tangled web of relationships among these clinical and diagnostic variables, showing how intricately they are intertwined and how they influence each other in complex patterns. This study provides valuable insights into the clinical patterns of TMD in elderly and super-elderly patients, emphasizing the need for tailored TMD management as this population grows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29749-x
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical features and subgroup patterns in elderly and super-elderly TMD patients

Q‐Schick Auh, Yung‐Kyun Noh, Hee‐Sung Kim, Tae-Seok Kim et al.
Scientific Reports
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Clinical features and subgroup patterns in elderly and super-elderly TMD patients

Q‐Schick Auh, Yung‐Kyun Noh, Hee‐Sung Kim, Tae-Seok Kim, Yeon‐Hee Lee, Seonggwang Jeon
article en

Abstract

This cross-sectional study compares TMD signs and symptoms in patients aged ≥ 65 (elderly) and ≥ 85 (super-elderly) with younger age groups. Additionally, this study sought to identify the key factors contributing to increased pain intensity in elderly and super-elderly patients with TMD. A total of 4,661 patients with TMD (mean age = 42.22 ± 20.08 years, 3069 women and 1592 men) were analyzed, categorized into six age groups, including those aged 65–74, 75–84, and 85 + years. The clinical characteristics, pain intensity (VAS), and TMD subgroup distribution were examined. Generalized linear models and 2D/3D visualizations were used to explore the correlations and multivariable relationships. Of the 4,661 patients aged 7–113 years, 16.8% were elderly and 1.1% were super-elderly. The female-to-male ratios in the elderly group were 1.93:1 and 1.78:1, with females being predominant across all age groups. Elderly groups, including those aged 65–74 (3.92 ± 2.49), 75–84 (3.94 ± 2.73), and 85 + years (3.92 ± 2.49), had significantly higher VAS scores compared to younger age groups (p < 0.001), indicating moderate pain levels. Maximum mouth opening values were significantly smaller in the 75–84 (38.81 ± 10.79 mm) and 85 + groups (38.08 ± 12.79 mm) compared to younger groups (p < 0.001). Arthralgia was one of the most prevalent TMD subgroups in both elderly (58.2%) and super-elderly (50.0%) patients. Degenerative joint disease was more prevalent in the super-elderly group (48.0%) than in the elderly group (37.9%) (P < 0.05). Chronic TMD was most prevalent in the 0–19 years group (50.3%), followed by the super-elderly group (44.0%) (p < 0.001). GLM analysis showed that TMJ pain (B = 1.324, p < 0.001), TMJ noise (B = 0.757, p < 0.001), and age (B = 0.014, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VAS scores, whereas increases in CMO (B = -0.011, p < 0.001) were associated with lower VAS scores. In the super-elderly group, the VAS score was also significantly associated with degenerative joint disease. The 2D and 3D visualizations revealed a tangled web of relationships among these clinical and diagnostic variables, showing how intricately they are intertwined and how they influence each other in complex patterns. This study provides valuable insights into the clinical patterns of TMD in elderly and super-elderly patients, emphasizing the need for tailored TMD management as this population grows.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KR), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital (KR), Center for Systems Biology (US), Hanyang University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Seoul National University, Kyung Hee University, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.