The role of research ethics committees in addressing optimism in sample size calculations: a meta-epidemiological study

Optimism in sample size calculations is common, but the influence of REC feedback on reducing overestimation appears limited. As this was a small, descriptive study from a single Dutch REC in 2015-2018, findings may not generalise to other settings or more recent practice. Future research should validate these findings and may help identify characteristics associated with overestimation, supporting RECs in recognising trials at risk of being underpowered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00184-w
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of research ethics committees in addressing optimism in sample size calculations: a meta-epidemiological study

Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Olaf M. Dekkers, Marieke S. Jansen
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

The role of research ethics committees in addressing optimism in sample size calculations: a meta-epidemiological study

Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Olaf M. Dekkers, Marieke S. Jansen
article en

Abstract

Optimism in sample size calculations is common, but the influence of REC feedback on reducing overestimation appears limited. As this was a small, descriptive study from a single Dutch REC in 2015-2018, findings may not generalise to other settings or more recent practice. Future research should validate these findings and may help identify characteristics associated with overestimation, supporting RECs in recognising trials at risk of being underpowered.

Research Integrity and Peer ReviewVol. 10(1)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.