Comparison of the efficacy of two non-pharmacological techniques in reducing pain during urinary catheterization: a randomized clinical trial

Urinary catheterization (UC), a commonly performed procedure in emergency departments (EDs), is often associated with significant patient discomfort and pain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two non-pharmacological techniques in reducing pain during UC. This randomized clinical trial included 54 male participants aged 18–65 years who underwent UC in the ED of Imam Khomeini Hospital. After obtaining ethical approval and informed consent, eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Intervention Group 1 (nasal pressure technique with closed epiglottis exhalation), Intervention Group 2 (deep cough technique), or the control group (routine UC procedure). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at three time points: immediately before, immediately after, and 15 min after the intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18. The mean age of participants was 49.09 ± 19.61 years. Both Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2 showed significant differences in pain levels compared to the control group immediately after the intervention (P = 0.046). Specifically, Intervention Group 1 experienced lower pain levels than the control group, while Intervention Group 2 reported higher pain levels. At 15 min post-intervention, pain levels in Intervention Group 1 were lower than in Intervention Group 2, and the control group reported lower pain levels than Intervention Group 2, though this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). The nasal pressure technique demonstrated a significant reduction in pain during UC, suggesting its potential as a simple, non-pharmacological intervention for pain management. Further studies are recommended to validate these findings and explore their applicability in clinical practice. This study was retrospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) under the registration number IRCT20191217045764N3 on March 17, 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Urology
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-02016-x
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the efficacy of two non-pharmacological techniques in reducing pain during urinary catheterization: a randomized clinical trial

Mohammad Namazinia, Mahdia Gholami, Hadi Abbaspour, Javad Sedaghati et al.
BMC Urology
Urinary Tract Infections Management
article

Comparison of the efficacy of two non-pharmacological techniques in reducing pain during urinary catheterization: a randomized clinical trial

Mohammad Namazinia, Mahdia Gholami, Hadi Abbaspour, Javad Sedaghati, Ali Abedi, Atefeh Moradi, Masoumeh Gharaee, Mohammad Gholami Moghaddam
article en

Abstract

Urinary catheterization (UC), a commonly performed procedure in emergency departments (EDs), is often associated with significant patient discomfort and pain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two non-pharmacological techniques in reducing pain during UC. This randomized clinical trial included 54 male participants aged 18–65 years who underwent UC in the ED of Imam Khomeini Hospital. After obtaining ethical approval and informed consent, eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Intervention Group 1 (nasal pressure technique with closed epiglottis exhalation), Intervention Group 2 (deep cough technique), or the control group (routine UC procedure). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at three time points: immediately before, immediately after, and 15 min after the intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18. The mean age of participants was 49.09 ± 19.61 years. Both Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2 showed significant differences in pain levels compared to the control group immediately after the intervention (P = 0.046). Specifically, Intervention Group 1 experienced lower pain levels than the control group, while Intervention Group 2 reported higher pain levels. At 15 min post-intervention, pain levels in Intervention Group 1 were lower than in Intervention Group 2, and the control group reported lower pain levels than Intervention Group 2, though this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). The nasal pressure technique demonstrated a significant reduction in pain during UC, suggesting its potential as a simple, non-pharmacological intervention for pain management. Further studies are recommended to validate these findings and explore their applicability in clinical practice. This study was retrospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) under the registration number IRCT20191217045764N3 on March 17, 2021.

BMC UrologyVol. 26(1)
Golestan University (IR), Torbat Heydarieh University of Medical Sciences (IR), Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR), Iranshahr University (IR), North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Esfarayen University of Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.