Five pillars of ethical AI use for teaching and learning

As generative AI tools reshape K-12 classrooms, teachers face urgent questions about what counts as thinking, learning, and authentic work. One thing is clear: teachers are responding and adapting, redesigning learning, leveraging and challenging AI’s affordances. Their stories reveal a profession in motion, grappling with deep pedagogical dilemmas — not just technical ones — at the heart of what learning is, and what we are deciding it still means. Drawing from over 60 teacher interviews, Brent Duckor and Carrie Holmberg propose five foundational “pillars” for ethical practice — Accuracy, Agency, Accessibility, Assessment, and Authenticity. Each of these pillars is associated with essential questions to guide intentional, equity-centered use of AI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phi Delta Kappan
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217251405515
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five pillars of ethical AI use for teaching and learning

Brent Duckor, Carrie Holmberg
Phi Delta Kappan
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Five pillars of ethical AI use for teaching and learning

Brent Duckor, Carrie Holmberg
article en

Abstract

As generative AI tools reshape K-12 classrooms, teachers face urgent questions about what counts as thinking, learning, and authentic work. One thing is clear: teachers are responding and adapting, redesigning learning, leveraging and challenging AI’s affordances. Their stories reveal a profession in motion, grappling with deep pedagogical dilemmas — not just technical ones — at the heart of what learning is, and what we are deciding it still means. Drawing from over 60 teacher interviews, Brent Duckor and Carrie Holmberg propose five foundational “pillars” for ethical practice — Accuracy, Agency, Accessibility, Assessment, and Authenticity. Each of these pillars is associated with essential questions to guide intentional, equity-centered use of AI.

Phi Delta KappanVol. 107(3-4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.