Acceptable or Not? Understanding Attitudes Toward Citizens' Discrimination Against Frontline Workers

ABSTRACT Research shows that frontline workers often discriminate based on race or ethnicity. However, citizens can also display discriminatory behavior—for instance, by requesting service only from workers of the same ethnic or religious background. This discrimination exercised by citizens toward frontline employees remains underexplored. Building on research on citizen–state interactions, discrimination, and political ideology, this study examines when the public considers such requests acceptable. We employ a vignette‐based survey experiment with 2067 Danish citizens, set in the context of home care services. Our findings show that requests based on language are perceived as more acceptable than those grounded in religion. Moreover, political ideology significantly shapes these attitudes: right‐leaning respondents are more likely to approve when the requester belongs to the ethnic majority, whereas left‐leaning respondents are more accepting when the requester is from an ethnic minority. While these single‐country findings may not generalize beyond one‐to‐one interactions characterized by high intimacy, they shed light on how ideology influences public attitudes toward ethnically motivated service preferences and highlight the need to further examine citizen‐driven discrimination in public service settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70037
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptable or Not? Understanding Attitudes Toward Citizens' Discrimination Against Frontline Workers

Aske Halling, Mathilde Cecchini, Benedicte Omand Grønhøj
Public Administration
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Acceptable or Not? Understanding Attitudes Toward Citizens' Discrimination Against Frontline Workers

Aske Halling, Mathilde Cecchini, Benedicte Omand Grønhøj
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research shows that frontline workers often discriminate based on race or ethnicity. However, citizens can also display discriminatory behavior—for instance, by requesting service only from workers of the same ethnic or religious background. This discrimination exercised by citizens toward frontline employees remains underexplored. Building on research on citizen–state interactions, discrimination, and political ideology, this study examines when the public considers such requests acceptable. We employ a vignette‐based survey experiment with 2067 Danish citizens, set in the context of home care services. Our findings show that requests based on language are perceived as more acceptable than those grounded in religion. Moreover, political ideology significantly shapes these attitudes: right‐leaning respondents are more likely to approve when the requester belongs to the ethnic majority, whereas left‐leaning respondents are more accepting when the requester is from an ethnic minority. While these single‐country findings may not generalize beyond one‐to‐one interactions characterized by high intimacy, they shed light on how ideology influences public attitudes toward ethnically motivated service preferences and highlight the need to further examine citizen‐driven discrimination in public service settings.

Public Administration
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK)
Aarhus Universitet, European Commission, National Research Foundation, Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, Syddansk Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.