Social vulnerability and the risk of respiratory virus infection in households: a case-ascertained study

This study examines whether the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a location-based composite measure of social vulnerability, is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 or influenza infection within households. Prospective cohort case-ascertained household transmission study. We analyzed data from a case-ascertained household transmission study conducted across multiple U.S. sites (September 2021–May 2023). Household contacts of index cases with confirmed infections self-collected nasal swabs daily for ten days, tested via RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or influenza. Age, sex, and vaccine receipt were self-reported, with vaccination verified. Household addresses were geocoded to 2020 census tracts and linked to the national SVI percentile. Using modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations, we assessed associations between census tract-level SVI and infection risk, adjusting for age, sex, vaccine receipt, and clustering by census tract. Participants included household contacts of index cases with SARS-CoV-2 (793 households, 1,408 participants) or influenza (273 households, 512 participants). We found that higher overall SVI was associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (adjusted Incidence risk ratio [aIRR] 1.24; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.52). Specifically, the socioeconomic SVI domain was linked to higher infection risk (aIRR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.51). Other SVI domains were not statistically significant. For influenza, SVI was overall associated with greater infection, but confidence intervals crossed the null (aIRR = 1.45; 95% CI: 0.88, 2.39). Household contacts of SARS-CoV-2 index cases in high-SVI areas faced an increased risk of infection. No significant association was found for influenza, likely due to the small sample size. Increased access to SARS-CoV-2 testing, treatment, and preventive measures (e.g., masking, handwashing, isolation) may be especially important in high-SVI areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-12310-6
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social vulnerability and the risk of respiratory virus infection in households: a case-ascertained study

Yvonne Maldonado, Clea Sarnquist, Jessica T. Lin, Sara Goodman et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Social vulnerability and the risk of respiratory virus infection in households: a case-ascertained study

Yvonne Maldonado, Clea Sarnquist, Jessica T. Lin, Sara Goodman, Edwin J. Asturias, Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat, Alexandra M. Mellis, Edward A. Belongia, Natalie M. Bowman, Ellen Sano, Suchitra Rao, Son H. McLaren, Melissa S. Stockwell, Carlos Gabriel Grijalva, Karen Lutrick, Katherine Ellingson, Jessica E. Biddle, Melissa A. Rolfes, Huong Q. Nguyen, H. Keipp Talbot
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a location-based composite measure of social vulnerability, is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 or influenza infection within households. Prospective cohort case-ascertained household transmission study. We analyzed data from a case-ascertained household transmission study conducted across multiple U.S. sites (September 2021–May 2023). Household contacts of index cases with confirmed infections self-collected nasal swabs daily for ten days, tested via RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or influenza. Age, sex, and vaccine receipt were self-reported, with vaccination verified. Household addresses were geocoded to 2020 census tracts and linked to the national SVI percentile. Using modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations, we assessed associations between census tract-level SVI and infection risk, adjusting for age, sex, vaccine receipt, and clustering by census tract. Participants included household contacts of index cases with SARS-CoV-2 (793 households, 1,408 participants) or influenza (273 households, 512 participants). We found that higher overall SVI was associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (adjusted Incidence risk ratio [aIRR] 1.24; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.52). Specifically, the socioeconomic SVI domain was linked to higher infection risk (aIRR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.51). Other SVI domains were not statistically significant. For influenza, SVI was overall associated with greater infection, but confidence intervals crossed the null (aIRR = 1.45; 95% CI: 0.88, 2.39). Household contacts of SARS-CoV-2 index cases in high-SVI areas faced an increased risk of infection. No significant association was found for influenza, likely due to the small sample size. Increased access to SARS-CoV-2 testing, treatment, and preventive measures (e.g., masking, handwashing, isolation) may be especially important in high-SVI areas.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 26(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Marshfield Clinic (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of Arizona (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.