Incentives for dwelling renovations: evidence from a large fiscal programme

Abstract We use counterfactual analysis to evaluate the economic impact of two tax credits for dwelling renovations (‘Bonus Facciate’ / facades bonus and ‘Superbonus 110%’), which were introduced in Italy in the second half of 2020 and led to expenditures amounting to about 3 per cent of GDP per year. Using the synthetic control method, we estimate that the deadweight loss – that is, the share of public expenditure on the programme that financed projects that would have been undertaken even without these incentives – is more than 25 per cent. The implied fiscal multiplier is slightly below 1, a figure lower than the ones associated with public investments in standard macroeconomic models or estimated for green investments. Input–output analysis shows that the incentives are responsible for the entire growth in value added in the construction sector between 2019 and 2023, while their effects on other sectors are more limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fiscal Studies
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentives for dwelling renovations: evidence from a large fiscal programme

Elisabetta Olivieri, Antonio Accetturo, Fabrizio Renzi
2 citations
Fiscal Studies
Urban Planning and Valuation
4.84
article

Incentives for dwelling renovations: evidence from a large fiscal programme

Elisabetta Olivieri, Antonio Accetturo, Fabrizio Renzi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We use counterfactual analysis to evaluate the economic impact of two tax credits for dwelling renovations (‘Bonus Facciate’ / facades bonus and ‘Superbonus 110%’), which were introduced in Italy in the second half of 2020 and led to expenditures amounting to about 3 per cent of GDP per year. Using the synthetic control method, we estimate that the deadweight loss – that is, the share of public expenditure on the programme that financed projects that would have been undertaken even without these incentives – is more than 25 per cent. The implied fiscal multiplier is slightly below 1, a figure lower than the ones associated with public investments in standard macroeconomic models or estimated for green investments. Input–output analysis shows that the incentives are responsible for the entire growth in value added in the construction sector between 2019 and 2023, while their effects on other sectors are more limited.

Fiscal Studies
Bank of Italy (IT), United States Department of the Treasury (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Urban Planning and Valuation
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incentives for dwelling renovations: evidence from a large fiscal programme — Elisabetta Olivieri, Antonio Accetturo, et al. · Fiscal Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS