The Coin's Third Side: Illiberal Money and the Sociality of a Community Currency

ABSTRACT Classic work in the analysis of money has emphasized the role of the state and the market in giving money its value. This article seeks to build on work that has emphasized the coin's “third side,” in which society serves as a source of monetary value. In so doing, the article builds on the concept of illiberal economies by theorizing what is termed illiberal money . It does so through an analysis of the Comox Valley LETSystem, a community currency developed in British Columbia in the mid‐1980s and intended to promote community resilience in the context of global recession and a local depression. Local exchange trading systems (LETS) are networks that create a unit of account distinct from state money to facilitate the exchange of goods and services between community members. This article suggests that, in contrast to liberal markets, where the goal of exchange is the generation of profit measured in money, the goal of LETS is to strengthen the interdependence of community members on one another by creating credit and inviting others to participate in commercial exchange through what is termed expanding the “credit field.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Anthropology
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.70024
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Coin's Third Side: Illiberal Money and the Sociality of a Community Currency

Daromir Rudnyckyj
Economic Anthropology
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

The Coin's Third Side: Illiberal Money and the Sociality of a Community Currency

Daromir Rudnyckyj
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Classic work in the analysis of money has emphasized the role of the state and the market in giving money its value. This article seeks to build on work that has emphasized the coin's “third side,” in which society serves as a source of monetary value. In so doing, the article builds on the concept of illiberal economies by theorizing what is termed illiberal money . It does so through an analysis of the Comox Valley LETSystem, a community currency developed in British Columbia in the mid‐1980s and intended to promote community resilience in the context of global recession and a local depression. Local exchange trading systems (LETS) are networks that create a unit of account distinct from state money to facilitate the exchange of goods and services between community members. This article suggests that, in contrast to liberal markets, where the goal of exchange is the generation of profit measured in money, the goal of LETS is to strengthen the interdependence of community members on one another by creating credit and inviting others to participate in commercial exchange through what is termed expanding the “credit field.”

Economic AnthropologyVol. 13(1)
University of Victoria (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Coin's Third Side: Illiberal Money and the Sociality of a Community Currency — Daromir Rudnyckyj · Economic Anthropology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS