State Ownership and Firm R&D Performance: Objectives or Capabilities?

ABSTRACT Although numerous studies compare the R&D performance of state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) and nonstate‐owned enterprises (NSOEs), few investigate the underlying mechanisms. Using a novel data set on the market value of patents held by Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that SOEs generate lower private economic value from innovation than NSOEs, while the scientific value of their innovations does not differ significantly. Our analysis suggests that the ownership‐related gap in R&D performance arises more from differences in firm objectives than from differences in capabilities. Specifically, SOEs exhibit weaker profit‐seeking incentives, which lead to lower private returns on innovation. These findings imply that SOEs' R&D activities generate greater positive externalities than those of NSOEs, underscoring the distinctive social contributions of SOE innovation and its nonsubstitutability by NSOE innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.70016
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Ownership and Firm R&D Performance: Objectives or Capabilities?

Meng Wu, Yang Ming
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

State Ownership and Firm R&D Performance: Objectives or Capabilities?

Meng Wu, Yang Ming
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although numerous studies compare the R&D performance of state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) and nonstate‐owned enterprises (NSOEs), few investigate the underlying mechanisms. Using a novel data set on the market value of patents held by Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that SOEs generate lower private economic value from innovation than NSOEs, while the scientific value of their innovations does not differ significantly. Our analysis suggests that the ownership‐related gap in R&D performance arises more from differences in firm objectives than from differences in capabilities. Specifically, SOEs exhibit weaker profit‐seeking incentives, which lead to lower private returns on innovation. These findings imply that SOEs' R&D activities generate greater positive externalities than those of NSOEs, underscoring the distinctive social contributions of SOE innovation and its nonsubstitutability by NSOE innovation.

Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Central University of Finance and Economics (CN), Xiamen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Central University of Finance and Economics, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.