AI-assisted radiographic identification of original vs. replica dental implants: comparing accuracy of human experts vs. probabilistic and deterministic AI

In dental implantology, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for the differentiation of various implant systems is gaining increasing importance. This study investigates the feasibility of distinguishing between two highly similar implant (original implant and its replica) systems using an automated, AI-based recognition software. A dataset of 906 radiographic images was initially compiled, consisting of standardized ex situ recordings of both the original and the replica implants (with and without a cover screw in situ). Four deterministic AI-models and one probabilistic model were trained using different subsets of varying sizes of the dataset, including the full dataset and then evaluated against a designated test dataset. For comparison, 28 dental professionals also assessed the same test dataset. The accuracy of the deterministic model trained solely with 488 radiographs of implants with inserted cover screws was 0.579 (57.9%). The second and third models, trained with a greater number of radiographs without inserted cover screws, achieved accuracies exceeding 0.90 and, in some instances, even reached 1.00. The fourth deterministic model, as well as the probabilistic model, comprising 28 classifiers and trained on the complete dataset, classified the test dataset without error. The dental professionals achieved an overall accuracy of 0.8616 (86.16%) in their assessment of the test dataset. This study suggests that AI-supported implant recognition software has the potential to offer valuable assistance in clinical practice for distinguishing between original and replica implants. Such differentiation can play a crucial role for prosthetic suprastructures and associated manufacturer warranties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00662-2
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-assisted radiographic identification of original vs. replica dental implants: comparing accuracy of human experts vs. probabilistic and deterministic AI

Samir Abou‐Ayash, Magnus Bremer, Sheraz Ahmed, Maximilian Blume et al.
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

AI-assisted radiographic identification of original vs. replica dental implants: comparing accuracy of human experts vs. probabilistic and deterministic AI

Samir Abou‐Ayash, Magnus Bremer, Sheraz Ahmed, Maximilian Blume, Muhammad Naseer Bajwa, Monika Bjelopavlovic, Katja Petrowski, Jochen Hardt
article en

Abstract

In dental implantology, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for the differentiation of various implant systems is gaining increasing importance. This study investigates the feasibility of distinguishing between two highly similar implant (original implant and its replica) systems using an automated, AI-based recognition software. A dataset of 906 radiographic images was initially compiled, consisting of standardized ex situ recordings of both the original and the replica implants (with and without a cover screw in situ). Four deterministic AI-models and one probabilistic model were trained using different subsets of varying sizes of the dataset, including the full dataset and then evaluated against a designated test dataset. For comparison, 28 dental professionals also assessed the same test dataset. The accuracy of the deterministic model trained solely with 488 radiographs of implants with inserted cover screws was 0.579 (57.9%). The second and third models, trained with a greater number of radiographs without inserted cover screws, achieved accuracies exceeding 0.90 and, in some instances, even reached 1.00. The fourth deterministic model, as well as the probabilistic model, comprising 28 classifiers and trained on the complete dataset, classified the test dataset without error. The dental professionals achieved an overall accuracy of 0.8616 (86.16%) in their assessment of the test dataset. This study suggests that AI-supported implant recognition software has the potential to offer valuable assistance in clinical practice for distinguishing between original and replica implants. Such differentiation can play a crucial role for prosthetic suprastructures and associated manufacturer warranties.

International Journal of Implant DentistryVol. 12(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Abdus Salam Centre for Physics (PK), National University of Technology (PK), National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.