The Politics of Abundance: Can Labour Count on a ‘Pro‐Growth Coalition’?

ABSTRACT The article examines the political challenges facing the Labour government as it seeks to advance a pro‐growth “Abundance” agenda centred on housebuilding, infrastructure investment and deregulation. Fourteen years of Conservative policy—marked by austerity, abandoned planning reforms, and curtailed infrastructure projects—reflected the priorities of an older, property‐owning voter base resistant to disruptive change. Labour's younger coalition is more open to removing barriers to housing, energy and technology, yet public attitudes towards growth‐enhancing policies remain conditional and often sceptical. Support for housebuilding hinges on visible investment in local services; enthusiasm for green energy weakens when voters fear higher bills; and major infrastructure schemes suffer from mistrust after past delivery failures. Deregulation is complicated by deep public suspicion of big business and strong support for institutional safeguards. By linking selective parts of an abundance agenda to fairness and tangible improvements in everyday life, the government may be able to overcome public scepticism and convert a technocratic growth narrative into a morally resonant political project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IPPR Progressive Review
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.70003
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Abundance: Can Labour Count on a ‘Pro‐Growth Coalition’?

Christabel Cooper
IPPR Progressive Review
Political and Economic history of UK and US
article

The Politics of Abundance: Can Labour Count on a ‘Pro‐Growth Coalition’?

Christabel Cooper
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The article examines the political challenges facing the Labour government as it seeks to advance a pro‐growth “Abundance” agenda centred on housebuilding, infrastructure investment and deregulation. Fourteen years of Conservative policy—marked by austerity, abandoned planning reforms, and curtailed infrastructure projects—reflected the priorities of an older, property‐owning voter base resistant to disruptive change. Labour's younger coalition is more open to removing barriers to housing, energy and technology, yet public attitudes towards growth‐enhancing policies remain conditional and often sceptical. Support for housebuilding hinges on visible investment in local services; enthusiasm for green energy weakens when voters fear higher bills; and major infrastructure schemes suffer from mistrust after past delivery failures. Deregulation is complicated by deep public suspicion of big business and strong support for institutional safeguards. By linking selective parts of an abundance agenda to fairness and tangible improvements in everyday life, the government may be able to overcome public scepticism and convert a technocratic growth narrative into a morally resonant political project.

IPPR Progressive Review
Together (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.