Multi‐Parameter Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cervix

The aim of this study is to examine cervix-adapted versions of steady-state multi-parameter MRS (SMP MRS) and flip-angle-corrected multi-parameter MRS (CMP MRS), comparing estimated cervix T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub> for the two sequences. CMP MRS and SMP MRS were adapted from liver versions of the sequences, adding long TR acquisitions to better estimate cervix T1<sub>w</sub>. CMP MRS differs from SMP MRS by correcting for inaccurate B1 calibration. Both CMP MRS and SMP MRS were acquired at 3 T in 13 adult female subjects (10 healthy, 3 with cancer). Values of T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub> were estimated from both sequences, and the relationship between the values was examined. While there was no significant difference in T1<sub>w</sub> given by the two sequences (CMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 1568 ms, SMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 1571 ms, p = 0.95; SMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 0.657 CMP T1<sub>w</sub> + 541 ms, r = 0.36), there was a single case where SMP MRS underestimated T1<sub>w</sub> by over 400 ms. A significant difference was observed in T2<sub>w</sub> (CMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 39.9 ms, SMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 45.6 ms, p = 0.001; SMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 0.812 CMP T2<sub>w</sub> + 13.3 ms, r = 0.87). Cervix adapted CMP MRS and SMP MRS both successfully estimated values of T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub>, though the single case where SMP MRS gave a non-physical T1<sub>w</sub> suggests CMP MRS may be better suited for cervix T1<sub>w</sub> estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NMR in Biomedicine
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70211
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐Parameter Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cervix

Rebecca Rakow‐Penner, Catherine J. Moran, Stephan Jordan, Gavin Hamilton et al.
NMR in Biomedicine
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Multi‐Parameter Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cervix

Rebecca Rakow‐Penner, Catherine J. Moran, Stephan Jordan, Gavin Hamilton, Breana Hill, Hon Yu, Alex N. Schlein, Summer Batasin, Ana E. Rodríguez‐Soto, Sheida Ebrahimi, Nicole A. Gamboa
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine cervix-adapted versions of steady-state multi-parameter MRS (SMP MRS) and flip-angle-corrected multi-parameter MRS (CMP MRS), comparing estimated cervix T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub> for the two sequences. CMP MRS and SMP MRS were adapted from liver versions of the sequences, adding long TR acquisitions to better estimate cervix T1<sub>w</sub>. CMP MRS differs from SMP MRS by correcting for inaccurate B1 calibration. Both CMP MRS and SMP MRS were acquired at 3 T in 13 adult female subjects (10 healthy, 3 with cancer). Values of T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub> were estimated from both sequences, and the relationship between the values was examined. While there was no significant difference in T1<sub>w</sub> given by the two sequences (CMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 1568 ms, SMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 1571 ms, p = 0.95; SMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 0.657 CMP T1<sub>w</sub> + 541 ms, r = 0.36), there was a single case where SMP MRS underestimated T1<sub>w</sub> by over 400 ms. A significant difference was observed in T2<sub>w</sub> (CMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 39.9 ms, SMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 45.6 ms, p = 0.001; SMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 0.812 CMP T2<sub>w</sub> + 13.3 ms, r = 0.87). Cervix adapted CMP MRS and SMP MRS both successfully estimated values of T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub>, though the single case where SMP MRS gave a non-physical T1<sub>w</sub> suggests CMP MRS may be better suited for cervix T1<sub>w</sub> estimation.

NMR in BiomedicineVol. 39(1)
University of California San Diego (US), La Jolla Bioengineering Institute (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi‐Parameter Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cervix — Rebecca Rakow‐Penner, Catherine J. Moran, et al. · NMR in Biomedicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS