<i>EIGENSINN</i> AND DOMINATION IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL SOCIETIES

ABSTRACT This article is a posthumously published text that was written by Alf Lüdtke and Alexandra Oeser but was left unfinished when Lüdtke died in February 2019. It examines two central notions—and their articulations—that Lüdtke and Oeser use differently in their work: domination and Eigensinn . On domination, it focuses on perspectives of Max Weber's work and different translations in English and French that have led to distinct receptions of the notion of domination in these languages. While locating the notion of Eigensinn back in its 1980s academic context, this article reconceptualizes Eigensinn as a blind spot of Weber's definition of domination that addresses the question of how people produce a “will to obey,” which Weber's work does not tackle. The article also debates the possibilities of using the notion of Eigensinn for liberal and illiberal societies. Oeser has written an introduction to guide the reader through the text and to recall the conditions surrounding its production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and Theory
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70021
Primary Topic
Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EIGENSINN AND DOMINATION IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL SOCIETIES

Alf Lüdtke, Alexandra Oeser
History and Theory
Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
article

EIGENSINN AND DOMINATION IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL SOCIETIES

Alf Lüdtke, Alexandra Oeser
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is a posthumously published text that was written by Alf Lüdtke and Alexandra Oeser but was left unfinished when Lüdtke died in February 2019. It examines two central notions—and their articulations—that Lüdtke and Oeser use differently in their work: domination and Eigensinn . On domination, it focuses on perspectives of Max Weber's work and different translations in English and French that have led to distinct receptions of the notion of domination in these languages. While locating the notion of Eigensinn back in its 1980s academic context, this article reconceptualizes Eigensinn as a blind spot of Weber's definition of domination that addresses the question of how people produce a “will to obey,” which Weber's work does not tackle. The article also debates the possibilities of using the notion of Eigensinn for liberal and illiberal societies. Oeser has written an introduction to guide the reader through the text and to recall the conditions surrounding its production.

History and TheoryVol. 65(1)
University of Erfurt (DE), Université Paris Nanterre (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.