Generalization for both diurnal and nocturnal pollination in the mass‐flowering desert geophyte <i>Nerine laticoma</i> (Amaryllidaceae)

The evolutionary limits to generalization in plant pollination systems are often determined by trade-offs in which adaptations to one set of flower visitors reduces the effectiveness of another set of visitors. A key question is whether flowers can be pollinated equally effectively during the day and the night, given that the attractants for diurnal visitors are expected to be very different to those for nocturnal visitors. To address this question, we investigated the pollination system of the mass-flowering desert geophyte Nerine laticoma (Amaryllidaceae) over 2 years. We measured floral traits, including colour, scent, dimensions, floral rewards, visitation and reproductive traits. Finally, we exposed a subset of flowers exclusively to either diurnal or nocturnal visitors to establish their relative contributions to reproduction. Nerine laticoma has relatively open flowers, with exposed nectar, attracting a wide diversity of pollinators, including bees, butterflies, nocturnal settling moths and hawkmoths. We established that N. laticoma is reliant on pollinators for seed production. Flowers exposed only during the day set a similar number of seeds to those exposed only during the night, indicating that the plant is effectively pollinated by both diurnal and nocturnal animals. The results highlight the importance of multiple pollinators and their contribution to reproductive success in desert environments with variable pollinator communities. The contribution of all possible pollinators in a system, including frequently overlooked nocturnal visitors, should thus be taken into account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Biology
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.70153
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalization for both diurnal and nocturnal pollination in the mass‐flowering desert geophyte Nerine laticoma (Amaryllidaceae)

Christine Barker, Miguel Castañeda‐Zárate, Steven D. Johnson, Carolina Diller et al.
Plant Biology
Plant and animal studies
article

Generalization for both diurnal and nocturnal pollination in the mass‐flowering desert geophyte Nerine laticoma (Amaryllidaceae)

Christine Barker, Miguel Castañeda‐Zárate, Steven D. Johnson, Carolina Diller, Genevieve Theron, Sjirk Geerts, Saskia Klumpers
article en

Abstract

The evolutionary limits to generalization in plant pollination systems are often determined by trade-offs in which adaptations to one set of flower visitors reduces the effectiveness of another set of visitors. A key question is whether flowers can be pollinated equally effectively during the day and the night, given that the attractants for diurnal visitors are expected to be very different to those for nocturnal visitors. To address this question, we investigated the pollination system of the mass-flowering desert geophyte Nerine laticoma (Amaryllidaceae) over 2 years. We measured floral traits, including colour, scent, dimensions, floral rewards, visitation and reproductive traits. Finally, we exposed a subset of flowers exclusively to either diurnal or nocturnal visitors to establish their relative contributions to reproduction. Nerine laticoma has relatively open flowers, with exposed nectar, attracting a wide diversity of pollinators, including bees, butterflies, nocturnal settling moths and hawkmoths. We established that N. laticoma is reliant on pollinators for seed production. Flowers exposed only during the day set a similar number of seeds to those exposed only during the night, indicating that the plant is effectively pollinated by both diurnal and nocturnal animals. The results highlight the importance of multiple pollinators and their contribution to reproductive success in desert environments with variable pollinator communities. The contribution of all possible pollinators in a system, including frequently overlooked nocturnal visitors, should thus be taken into account.

Plant BiologyVol. 28(2)
Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL), Cape Peninsula University of Technology (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Agricultural Research Council of South Africa (ZA), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Cape Peninsula University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.