Highlighting the CORD‐SaFe Trial From Melbourne—Progress Toward Cellular Therapy in Extremely Preterm Newborns

Preterm brain injury remains a significant challenge for extremely preterm infants (< 28 weeks gestation), often leading to long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. Despite advancements in antenatal care, neonatal therapeutics for the prevention or treatment of brain injuries are limited [1]. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) has emerged as a promising source of stem cells, offering neuroprotective effects via immune-modulating mechanisms observed in preclinical models [2, 3]. Although autologous UCB-derived therapies have shown safety and efficacy in term and moderately preterm neonates, their feasibility and safety in highly preterm infants had not been studied. The CORD-SaFe study, published earlier in 2025 in eBioMedicine, aimed to evaluate the feasibility of collecting, processing, and administering autologous UCB, as well as the safety of intravenous reinfusion of UCB-derived cells in this high-risk population [4]. Here, we aim to discuss an essential original study published in The Lancet [4]. We conducted no separate formal analysis apart from that published by Zhou et al. The CORD-SaFE trial was a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase I clinical trial conducted at Monash Medical Center and Monash Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Eligible participants included extremely preterm infants (< 28 weeks gestation) without major congenital malformations or severe brain injuries. UCB was collected at birth using sterile techniques and processed to isolate mononuclear cells (MNCs). Cryopreserved cells were reinfused intravenously during the second postnatal week at doses of 25–50 million MNCs/kg. Feasibility outcomes included sufficient UCB volume (> 7 mL) and adequate cell counts (> 25 × 106 total nucleated cells/kg). Safety outcomes focused on adverse events related to cell infusion. Exploratory analyses included cytokine profiling before and after infusion. Of 117 eligible infants, 51 consented, and UCB collection was attempted in 44. Adequate UCB volume and cell extraction were successful in 37 cases (84.1%). Good manufacturing practice-grade umbilical cord blood-derived cells (UCBCs) were available in 31 (70.5%) of those attempts (Figure 1). Ultimately, 23 extremely preterm infants received autologous UCBC infusion. The median gestational age was 26 weeks, and the median cell dose infused was 42.3 million mononuclear cells per kilogram (Table 1). Consort diagram depicting CORD-SaFe study recruitment from May 2021 to November 2023. No serious adverse events were directly related to the infusion. Vital signs remained stable before, during, and after the infusion. There was one death, unrelated to the treatment, due to a bloodstream infection. Two cases had post-production microbial contamination; however, blood cultures from those infants were negative and both remained stable. Feasibility was further supported by the relatively high cell counts and adequate processing quality, even in the context of deferred cord clamping, which was performed in 69.5% of cases. Although some UCB units were excluded due to contamination or blood typing issues, the overall success rate was considered high enough to justify advancing to the next trial phase. Exploratory biomarker changes observed in this study require validation in future controlled studies with appropriate comparison groups. These preliminary findings cannot be interpreted as evidence of therapeutic efficacy and should be considered hypothesis-generating for future research. A comparison with a contemporaneous cohort (n = 93) which did not receive UCBC therapy showed no significant differences in major neonatal morbidities, although the trial was not powered for efficacy comparisons. The CORD SaFe trial has established that UCB collection and reinfusion are feasible for approximately 70% of extremely preterm infants. The therapy was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events directly attributable to the UCBC infusion. The findings by Zhou et al. provide a foundation for further studies exploring the efficacy of autologous UCB-derived cell therapy in reducing preterm brain injury and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes [4]. Future research will include long-term follow-up assessments to evaluate developmental outcomes and refine therapeutic protocols for broader clinical application. These results support progressing to more extensive controlled trials to assess efficacy. The next step, the CORD-CELL trial, is already underway to further evaluate outcomes, including long-termneurodevelopmental effects [5]. Aditya Bhatt: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing – original draft. Somashekhar Nimbalkar: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing – review and editing, supervision, visualization, validation. Dipen Patel: visualization, writing – review and editing. Reshma Pujara: validation, writing – review and editing. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Discovery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi3.70021
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Highlighting the CORD‐SaFe Trial From Melbourne—Progress Toward Cellular Therapy in Extremely Preterm Newborns

Somashekhar Marutirao Nimbalkar, Reshma Kushal Pujara, Dipen Vasudev Patel, Aditya Hemendra Bhatt
Pediatric Discovery
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

Highlighting the CORD‐SaFe Trial From Melbourne—Progress Toward Cellular Therapy in Extremely Preterm Newborns

Somashekhar Marutirao Nimbalkar, Reshma Kushal Pujara, Dipen Vasudev Patel, Aditya Hemendra Bhatt
article en

Abstract

Preterm brain injury remains a significant challenge for extremely preterm infants (< 28 weeks gestation), often leading to long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. Despite advancements in antenatal care, neonatal therapeutics for the prevention or treatment of brain injuries are limited [1]. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) has emerged as a promising source of stem cells, offering neuroprotective effects via immune-modulating mechanisms observed in preclinical models [2, 3]. Although autologous UCB-derived therapies have shown safety and efficacy in term and moderately preterm neonates, their feasibility and safety in highly preterm infants had not been studied. The CORD-SaFe study, published earlier in 2025 in eBioMedicine, aimed to evaluate the feasibility of collecting, processing, and administering autologous UCB, as well as the safety of intravenous reinfusion of UCB-derived cells in this high-risk population [4]. Here, we aim to discuss an essential original study published in The Lancet [4]. We conducted no separate formal analysis apart from that published by Zhou et al. The CORD-SaFE trial was a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase I clinical trial conducted at Monash Medical Center and Monash Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Eligible participants included extremely preterm infants (< 28 weeks gestation) without major congenital malformations or severe brain injuries. UCB was collected at birth using sterile techniques and processed to isolate mononuclear cells (MNCs). Cryopreserved cells were reinfused intravenously during the second postnatal week at doses of 25–50 million MNCs/kg. Feasibility outcomes included sufficient UCB volume (> 7 mL) and adequate cell counts (> 25 × 106 total nucleated cells/kg). Safety outcomes focused on adverse events related to cell infusion. Exploratory analyses included cytokine profiling before and after infusion. Of 117 eligible infants, 51 consented, and UCB collection was attempted in 44. Adequate UCB volume and cell extraction were successful in 37 cases (84.1%). Good manufacturing practice-grade umbilical cord blood-derived cells (UCBCs) were available in 31 (70.5%) of those attempts (Figure 1). Ultimately, 23 extremely preterm infants received autologous UCBC infusion. The median gestational age was 26 weeks, and the median cell dose infused was 42.3 million mononuclear cells per kilogram (Table 1). Consort diagram depicting CORD-SaFe study recruitment from May 2021 to November 2023. No serious adverse events were directly related to the infusion. Vital signs remained stable before, during, and after the infusion. There was one death, unrelated to the treatment, due to a bloodstream infection. Two cases had post-production microbial contamination; however, blood cultures from those infants were negative and both remained stable. Feasibility was further supported by the relatively high cell counts and adequate processing quality, even in the context of deferred cord clamping, which was performed in 69.5% of cases. Although some UCB units were excluded due to contamination or blood typing issues, the overall success rate was considered high enough to justify advancing to the next trial phase. Exploratory biomarker changes observed in this study require validation in future controlled studies with appropriate comparison groups. These preliminary findings cannot be interpreted as evidence of therapeutic efficacy and should be considered hypothesis-generating for future research. A comparison with a contemporaneous cohort (n = 93) which did not receive UCBC therapy showed no significant differences in major neonatal morbidities, although the trial was not powered for efficacy comparisons. The CORD SaFe trial has established that UCB collection and reinfusion are feasible for approximately 70% of extremely preterm infants. The therapy was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events directly attributable to the UCBC infusion. The findings by Zhou et al. provide a foundation for further studies exploring the efficacy of autologous UCB-derived cell therapy in reducing preterm brain injury and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes [4]. Future research will include long-term follow-up assessments to evaluate developmental outcomes and refine therapeutic protocols for broader clinical application. These results support progressing to more extensive controlled trials to assess efficacy. The next step, the CORD-CELL trial, is already underway to further evaluate outcomes, including long-termneurodevelopmental effects [5]. Aditya Bhatt: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing – original draft. Somashekhar Nimbalkar: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing – review and editing, supervision, visualization, validation. Dipen Patel: visualization, writing – review and editing. Reshma Pujara: validation, writing – review and editing. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Pediatric DiscoveryVol. 3(4)
Pramukhswami Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.