Two Regimes of Waste and Value: ‘Post‐Disaster’ Landscapes in a New India

ABSTRACT In this age of ‘disaster capitalism’, catastrophes are neither ‘natural’ nor ‘external’. They are political events mediating and vitally shaping the unequal and exploitative use of environmental resources. India's ‘post‐disaster’ landscapes at the turn of the new millennium powerfully demonstrate how visions of the new‐normal can be imposed in the aftermath of a catastrophe by indomitable state–capital alliances. Insidious ideas of entrepreneurship and a muscular Hindutva‐tinged liberalization have served as the main tropes of post‐disaster recovery and management interventions in India over the past two decades. The article demonstrates how these post‐disaster landscapes, as seen in the cases of the 2001 Gujarat earthquake and 1999 Odisha super‐cyclone, can be understood through regimes of waste and value, which redefine the meanings of space and nature. At their core, these regimes rely on the purposive use of institutions, laws and discourses by powerful actors at multiple levels. The article suggests that the post‐disaster landscape offers a unique perspective into the everyday environmental authoritarianism unfolding throughout India today.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Development and Change
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70038
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Regimes of Waste and Value: ‘Post‐Disaster’ Landscapes in a New India

David Singh, Vasudha Chhotray
Development and Change
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Two Regimes of Waste and Value: ‘Post‐Disaster’ Landscapes in a New India

David Singh, Vasudha Chhotray
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this age of ‘disaster capitalism’, catastrophes are neither ‘natural’ nor ‘external’. They are political events mediating and vitally shaping the unequal and exploitative use of environmental resources. India's ‘post‐disaster’ landscapes at the turn of the new millennium powerfully demonstrate how visions of the new‐normal can be imposed in the aftermath of a catastrophe by indomitable state–capital alliances. Insidious ideas of entrepreneurship and a muscular Hindutva‐tinged liberalization have served as the main tropes of post‐disaster recovery and management interventions in India over the past two decades. The article demonstrates how these post‐disaster landscapes, as seen in the cases of the 2001 Gujarat earthquake and 1999 Odisha super‐cyclone, can be understood through regimes of waste and value, which redefine the meanings of space and nature. At their core, these regimes rely on the purposive use of institutions, laws and discourses by powerful actors at multiple levels. The article suggests that the post‐disaster landscape offers a unique perspective into the everyday environmental authoritarianism unfolding throughout India today.

Development and ChangeVol. 57(1)
UNICEF, École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, University of East Anglia
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.