Anti-scatter grid performance in digital mammography and contrast-enhanced mammography: a Monte Carlo study

<i>Objective.</i>Digital mammography (DM) and dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) use the same anti-scatter grid, despite their differences in x-ray spectra. This study investigated grid performance under clinically relevant conditions in DM and CEM across representative ranges of patient characteristics and assessed the effect of increased grid ratior.<i>Approach.</i>Monte Carlo simulations of low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images of a clinical DM/CEM system were performed using realistically shaped compressed breast phantoms with varying thickness, size, and composition. Linear grids withr= 5, 10, 15, and 20 were simulated. Grid performance was measured via the signal-difference-to-noise-ratio (SDNR) improvement factor (SIF), and differences in spatial scatter distributions were assessed via scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) profiles.<i>Main results.</i>Breast composition had no considerable impact on grid performance for DM or CEM. SIF increased with breast size by an average of 1.3% (LE) and 6.9% (HE), and with breast thickness by 21%-30% (LE) and 19%-27% (HE). The standard grid (r=5) did not reduce SDNR in LE or HE images for the examined thickness range (30-90 mm). Higher grid ratios improved SPR homogeneity between LE and HE images in the inner projected breast area. A grid withr=10yielded up to 4% higher SIF at the centre of mass thanr=5in HE images, while causing a maximum SDNR loss of 3.5% for 30 mm thick breasts in LE images.<i>Significance.</i>This study provides clinically relevant measures of grid performance in DM and CEM, closing a gap on missing insights of breast size effects. Contrary to previous findings, SDNR is not necessarily degraded for thin breasts under standard imaging conditions. Increasing the grid ratio tor=10improves HE image quality and might reduce rim artifacts in CEM due to increased SPR homogeneity, with minimal SDNR loss in DM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae2c39
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-scatter grid performance in digital mammography and contrast-enhanced mammography: a Monte Carlo study

Franziska Mauter, Ruben E. van Engen, Ioannis Sechopoulos, Mathias Anton
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Anti-scatter grid performance in digital mammography and contrast-enhanced mammography: a Monte Carlo study

Franziska Mauter, Ruben E. van Engen, Ioannis Sechopoulos, Mathias Anton
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Digital mammography (DM) and dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) use the same anti-scatter grid, despite their differences in x-ray spectra. This study investigated grid performance under clinically relevant conditions in DM and CEM across representative ranges of patient characteristics and assessed the effect of increased grid ratior.<i>Approach.</i>Monte Carlo simulations of low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images of a clinical DM/CEM system were performed using realistically shaped compressed breast phantoms with varying thickness, size, and composition. Linear grids withr= 5, 10, 15, and 20 were simulated. Grid performance was measured via the signal-difference-to-noise-ratio (SDNR) improvement factor (SIF), and differences in spatial scatter distributions were assessed via scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) profiles.<i>Main results.</i>Breast composition had no considerable impact on grid performance for DM or CEM. SIF increased with breast size by an average of 1.3% (LE) and 6.9% (HE), and with breast thickness by 21%-30% (LE) and 19%-27% (HE). The standard grid (r=5) did not reduce SDNR in LE or HE images for the examined thickness range (30-90 mm). Higher grid ratios improved SPR homogeneity between LE and HE images in the inner projected breast area. A grid withr=10yielded up to 4% higher SIF at the centre of mass thanr=5in HE images, while causing a maximum SDNR loss of 3.5% for 30 mm thick breasts in LE images.<i>Significance.</i>This study provides clinically relevant measures of grid performance in DM and CEM, closing a gap on missing insights of breast size effects. Contrary to previous findings, SDNR is not necessarily degraded for thin breasts under standard imaging conditions. Increasing the grid ratio tor=10improves HE image quality and might reduce rim artifacts in CEM due to increased SPR homogeneity, with minimal SDNR loss in DM.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 71(1)
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Dutch Expert Centre for Screening (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.