Comparative Adsorptive Removal of Arsenate From Water Systems Using Iron Phosphate (FePO <sub>4</sub> ), Unmodified, and Iron‐Impregnated Activated Carbons From Water Systems

ABSTRACT Arsenic contamination in aquatic systems presents severe environmental and health hazards and can result from both human activities and natural occurrences. The focus of the current study was to investigate arsenate adsorption onto FePO 4 , unmodified activated carbon (VAC), and iron‐impregnated activated carbon (Fe‐AC) to create an efficient arsenic‐removal adsorbent. BET surface area analysis showed the highest surface area for VAC (525 m 2 g −1 ), followed by Fe‐AC (140 m 2 g −1 ) and FePO 4 (80 m 2 g −1 ) surface area, which decreased with increasing calcination temperatures owing to particle agglomeration. FTIR spectra confirmed the formation of Fe–O and Fe–OH bonds in Fe‐AC, while XRD analysis confirmed that VAC exhibited amorphous behavior, and the calcination at 750 °C transformed the crystalline phase of FePO 4 and Fe‐AC. The point of zero charge (PZC) trend followed Fe‐AC &gt; FePO 4 &gt; VAC, in comparison to arsenate adsorption. The kinetic data best fitted to the pseudo‐second order (PSO) model, suggesting chemisorption‐controlled mechanisms, and the sharp equilibrium data fitted the Langmuir isotherm for monolayer adsorption. The adsorption capacities ( q m) and Langmuir constants ( K L ) decreased with increasing pH but were enhanced considerably with an increase in temperature. The thermodynamic parameters (Δ H ° &gt; 0, Δ G ° &lt; 0, Δ S ° &lt; 0) confirmed that the process was endothermic, spontaneous, and feasible. Activation energy values complement the stronger adsorption affinity of Fe‐AC compared with FePO 4 . Both adsorbents removed almost 100% of arsenic from real water samples; however, as Fe‐AC was able to show higher performance based on enhanced surface reactivity and better iron dispersion, it would be favorable in adsorption. The overall findings suggest that Fe‐AC holds a good promise as a sustainable and regenerable adsorbent for arsenic remediation in water treatment applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemistrySelect
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202504792
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Adsorptive Removal of Arsenate From Water Systems Using Iron Phosphate (FePO 4 ), Unmodified, and Iron‐Impregnated Activated Carbons From Water Systems

Tahira Mahmood, Muhammad Hamayun, Muhammad Asam Raza, Navak Badr et al.
ChemistrySelect
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
article

Comparative Adsorptive Removal of Arsenate From Water Systems Using Iron Phosphate (FePO 4 ), Unmodified, and Iron‐Impregnated Activated Carbons From Water Systems

Tahira Mahmood, Muhammad Hamayun, Muhammad Asam Raza, Navak Badr, Abdul Naeem
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Arsenic contamination in aquatic systems presents severe environmental and health hazards and can result from both human activities and natural occurrences. The focus of the current study was to investigate arsenate adsorption onto FePO 4 , unmodified activated carbon (VAC), and iron‐impregnated activated carbon (Fe‐AC) to create an efficient arsenic‐removal adsorbent. BET surface area analysis showed the highest surface area for VAC (525 m 2 g −1 ), followed by Fe‐AC (140 m 2 g −1 ) and FePO 4 (80 m 2 g −1 ) surface area, which decreased with increasing calcination temperatures owing to particle agglomeration. FTIR spectra confirmed the formation of Fe–O and Fe–OH bonds in Fe‐AC, while XRD analysis confirmed that VAC exhibited amorphous behavior, and the calcination at 750 °C transformed the crystalline phase of FePO 4 and Fe‐AC. The point of zero charge (PZC) trend followed Fe‐AC &gt; FePO 4 &gt; VAC, in comparison to arsenate adsorption. The kinetic data best fitted to the pseudo‐second order (PSO) model, suggesting chemisorption‐controlled mechanisms, and the sharp equilibrium data fitted the Langmuir isotherm for monolayer adsorption. The adsorption capacities ( q m) and Langmuir constants ( K L ) decreased with increasing pH but were enhanced considerably with an increase in temperature. The thermodynamic parameters (Δ H ° &gt; 0, Δ G ° &lt; 0, Δ S ° &lt; 0) confirmed that the process was endothermic, spontaneous, and feasible. Activation energy values complement the stronger adsorption affinity of Fe‐AC compared with FePO 4 . Both adsorbents removed almost 100% of arsenic from real water samples; however, as Fe‐AC was able to show higher performance based on enhanced surface reactivity and better iron dispersion, it would be favorable in adsorption. The overall findings suggest that Fe‐AC holds a good promise as a sustainable and regenerable adsorbent for arsenic remediation in water treatment applications.

ChemistrySelectVol. 10(47)
University of Peshawar (PK), University of Gujrat (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.