Imaginary part of the effective action in de Sitter spacetime with different regularization schemes

The imaginary part of the effective action encodes vacuum instability and particle production in the background field. Two standard approaches are commonly used to derive it: the Bogoliubov method and the Green’s function method, which are usually expected to agree. However, in de Sitter spacetime they yield different results. We revisit this problem by introducing explicit time and momentum cutoffs in the Green’s function representation of the effective action. The apparent discrepancy is found to be due to the different limiting procedures in regularization, which reproduces the Bogoliubov result and the Green’s function result, respectively. Therefore, the two approaches are understood to be different regularization limits of the same expression, which clarifies the origin of their disagreement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/tpdv-2q6v
Primary Topic
Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imaginary part of the effective action in de Sitter spacetime with different regularization schemes

Karl J. Friston
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
article

Imaginary part of the effective action in de Sitter spacetime with different regularization schemes

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

The imaginary part of the effective action encodes vacuum instability and particle production in the background field. Two standard approaches are commonly used to derive it: the Bogoliubov method and the Green’s function method, which are usually expected to agree. However, in de Sitter spacetime they yield different results. We revisit this problem by introducing explicit time and momentum cutoffs in the Green’s function representation of the effective action. The apparent discrepancy is found to be due to the different limiting procedures in regularization, which reproduces the Bogoliubov result and the Green’s function result, respectively. Therefore, the two approaches are understood to be different regularization limits of the same expression, which clarifies the origin of their disagreement.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(2)
Beihang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.