The Impact of anterior cruciate ligament rupture on athletes return to sport - A Literature review

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common and most burdensome injuries in sport, particularly in disciplines requiring rapid changes of direction, braking, and jumping. Despite advances in surgery and rehabilitation, return to sport (RTS) remains a complex process ~80% of athletes resume activity, yet only ~50-65% regain their preinjury level of competition. Additional challenges include a high risk of reinjury and long-term sequelae, including early degenerative changes in the knee. Psychological factors also play a key role, especially fear of reinjury and decreased trust in the operated limb. Materials and Methods This narrative review was based on original studies, meta-analyses and systematic reviews, as well as cohort, clinical, and qualitative studies concerning: the epidemiology and consequences of ACL injury outcomes of surgical and nonoperative treatment RTS rates and reinjury risk functional/psychological criteria for return to sports (RTS) decisions rehabilitation protocols and secondary prevention, and prognostic factors (age, sex, discipline, concomitant injuries) Selection of publications was guided by high clinical usefulness and direct relevance to return to sport. Summary The findings indicate that ACL reconstruction does not guarantee better RTS rates than modern nonoperative rehabilitation; the differences are clinically small. Decisions about return should not be based solely on time but on objective criteria: symmetry of strength and hop-test results, stable dynamic control, and psychological readiness. A criterion-based rehabilitation program lasting at least 9 months reduces the risk of re-injury, and neuromuscular programs reduce secondary risk by ~40-50%. The high risk of reinjury among young athletes and frequent long-term degenerative changes underscore the need for a holistic approach combining sports medicine, physiotherapy, psychological support, and long-term prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality in Sport
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12775/qs.2025.48.66870
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of anterior cruciate ligament rupture on athletes return to sport - A Literature review

Julia Matuszewska, Rafał Rusiłowicz, Paulina Jakubowska, Michał Józef Peszt et al.
Quality in Sport
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

The Impact of anterior cruciate ligament rupture on athletes return to sport - A Literature review

Julia Matuszewska, Rafał Rusiłowicz, Paulina Jakubowska, Michał Józef Peszt, Kacper Poręba, Mikołaj Szaryński, Aleksandra Lewandowska-Mackiewicz, Martyna Poręba, Antoni Wasilczuk, Kamila Prokopczyk
article en

Abstract

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common and most burdensome injuries in sport, particularly in disciplines requiring rapid changes of direction, braking, and jumping. Despite advances in surgery and rehabilitation, return to sport (RTS) remains a complex process ~80% of athletes resume activity, yet only ~50-65% regain their preinjury level of competition. Additional challenges include a high risk of reinjury and long-term sequelae, including early degenerative changes in the knee. Psychological factors also play a key role, especially fear of reinjury and decreased trust in the operated limb. Materials and Methods This narrative review was based on original studies, meta-analyses and systematic reviews, as well as cohort, clinical, and qualitative studies concerning: the epidemiology and consequences of ACL injury outcomes of surgical and nonoperative treatment RTS rates and reinjury risk functional/psychological criteria for return to sports (RTS) decisions rehabilitation protocols and secondary prevention, and prognostic factors (age, sex, discipline, concomitant injuries) Selection of publications was guided by high clinical usefulness and direct relevance to return to sport. Summary The findings indicate that ACL reconstruction does not guarantee better RTS rates than modern nonoperative rehabilitation; the differences are clinically small. Decisions about return should not be based solely on time but on objective criteria: symmetry of strength and hop-test results, stable dynamic control, and psychological readiness. A criterion-based rehabilitation program lasting at least 9 months reduces the risk of re-injury, and neuromuscular programs reduce secondary risk by ~40-50%. The high risk of reinjury among young athletes and frequent long-term degenerative changes underscore the need for a holistic approach combining sports medicine, physiotherapy, psychological support, and long-term prevention.

Quality in SportVol. 48
Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.