Co-evolution of groups and opinions in an agent-based model

This study explores a model for the co-evolution of opinions and groups, related to opinion polarization and group identity in opinion dynamics. While traditional models focus on pairwise interactions, we incorporate the notion of groups thereby allowing agents to identify other agents as in-group or out-group. By modifying key parameters we examine how understanding interactions as in-group or out-group affects the convergence or divergence of opinions. Our findings reveal that attitude towards out-group plays a leading role in the polarization of such systems, while in-group interactions can temper extreme opinion shifts or even fragment groups. This model offers an understanding of the complex interplay between group identification and polarization, providing a contribution to ongoing debates about segregation and sectarianism in public and private spheres.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338486
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-evolution of groups and opinions in an agent-based model

Antoine Vendeville, Pedro Ramaciotti Morales, Lionel Tabourier, Duncan Cassells
PLoS ONE
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

Co-evolution of groups and opinions in an agent-based model

Antoine Vendeville, Pedro Ramaciotti Morales, Lionel Tabourier, Duncan Cassells
article en

Abstract

This study explores a model for the co-evolution of opinions and groups, related to opinion polarization and group identity in opinion dynamics. While traditional models focus on pairwise interactions, we incorporate the notion of groups thereby allowing agents to identify other agents as in-group or out-group. By modifying key parameters we examine how understanding interactions as in-group or out-group affects the convergence or divergence of opinions. Our findings reveal that attitude towards out-group plays a leading role in the polarization of such systems, while in-group interactions can temper extreme opinion shifts or even fragment groups. This model offers an understanding of the complex interplay between group identification and polarization, providing a contribution to ongoing debates about segregation and sectarianism in public and private spheres.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(12)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes (FR), CY Cergy Paris Université (FR), LIP6 (FR), Institut des Systèmes Complexes Paris Île-de-France (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Paris, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, CHIST-ERA
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co-evolution of groups and opinions in an agent-based model — Antoine Vendeville, Pedro Ramaciotti Morales, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS