Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements

Abstract Numerical simulation models for laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) vary in complexity and fidelity, ranging from high-fidelity models that capture melt pool dynamics to simplified models suited for part-scale temperature predictions and process optimizations. Validation against experimental data is essential to build confidence in their predictive capabilities. However, for in-situ thermographic measurements, a direct comparison is challenging due to the data’s size and the multi-scale nature of the process. Similarities must be analyzed at different spatial and temporal scales based on the model’s fidelity and its intended application. For example, agreement between a thermal simulation and measurement in a steady-state scenario does not guarantee accuracy during transient phases. Statistical similarity measures provide a quantitative means to assess model-measurement agreement, highlighting regions of high and low similarity. In this work, we validate a thermal simulation model, discretized using the space-time finite element method, against thermographic camera measurements using various similarity measures and evaluate their applicability to PBF-LB/M. We also propose a multi-scale similarity assessment approach tailored to model fidelity and application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrating materials and manufacturing innovation
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-025-00430-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements

Vijaya Holla, Jesse Redford, Stefan Kollmannsberger, Philipp Kopp et al.
1 citations
Integrating materials and manufacturing innovation
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements

Vijaya Holla, Jesse Redford, Stefan Kollmannsberger, Philipp Kopp, Brandon Lane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Numerical simulation models for laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) vary in complexity and fidelity, ranging from high-fidelity models that capture melt pool dynamics to simplified models suited for part-scale temperature predictions and process optimizations. Validation against experimental data is essential to build confidence in their predictive capabilities. However, for in-situ thermographic measurements, a direct comparison is challenging due to the data’s size and the multi-scale nature of the process. Similarities must be analyzed at different spatial and temporal scales based on the model’s fidelity and its intended application. For example, agreement between a thermal simulation and measurement in a steady-state scenario does not guarantee accuracy during transient phases. Statistical similarity measures provide a quantitative means to assess model-measurement agreement, highlighting regions of high and low similarity. In this work, we validate a thermal simulation model, discretized using the space-time finite element method, against thermographic camera measurements using various similarity measures and evaluate their applicability to PBF-LB/M. We also propose a multi-scale similarity assessment approach tailored to model fidelity and application.

Integrating materials and manufacturing innovationVol. 15(1)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), Munich University of Applied Sciences (DE), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.