Evaluation of an adaptive system for breathing control in closed-loop diaphragm pacing

Abstract Objectives Existing diaphragm pacing (DP) system use an open-loop control method with a fixed stimulation mode to control breathing. It requires doctors to manually adjust stimulation parameters to meet the patient’s ventilation needs. Methods A neural network adaptive controller was tested to control breathing in DP system. For the diaphragm motion model, the respiratory airflow of healthy adults and rabbits was collected and compared with the simulation calculation results to verify the accuracy of the model. The performance of the adaptive controller was evaluated comparatively with that of the PID controller. Adaptive controller consists of a neural network and adaptively adjusts stimulation parameters to produce the desired respiratory volume waveform. Superiority of the output performance of the adaptive controller was further studied by setting various diaphragm model parameters. We further verified the feasibility of the adaptive controller through animal testing. Results The adaptive controller is better than the PID controller in maintaining the stability of the desired breath volume. Application of the adaptive controller can reduce the root mean square (RMS) error between the desired breath volume and the actual value to less than 6 %. Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential application of adaptive controllers in closed-loop DP systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2025-0310
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of an adaptive system for breathing control in closed-loop diaphragm pacing

Yan Shi, Zhihao Mao, Yixuan Wang, Wei Zhong et al.
Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Evaluation of an adaptive system for breathing control in closed-loop diaphragm pacing

Yan Shi, Zhihao Mao, Yixuan Wang, Wei Zhong, Xiaoyu Gu, Zong Han Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Existing diaphragm pacing (DP) system use an open-loop control method with a fixed stimulation mode to control breathing. It requires doctors to manually adjust stimulation parameters to meet the patient’s ventilation needs. Methods A neural network adaptive controller was tested to control breathing in DP system. For the diaphragm motion model, the respiratory airflow of healthy adults and rabbits was collected and compared with the simulation calculation results to verify the accuracy of the model. The performance of the adaptive controller was evaluated comparatively with that of the PID controller. Adaptive controller consists of a neural network and adaptively adjusts stimulation parameters to produce the desired respiratory volume waveform. Superiority of the output performance of the adaptive controller was further studied by setting various diaphragm model parameters. We further verified the feasibility of the adaptive controller through animal testing. Results The adaptive controller is better than the PID controller in maintaining the stability of the desired breath volume. Application of the adaptive controller can reduce the root mean square (RMS) error between the desired breath volume and the actual value to less than 6 %. Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential application of adaptive controllers in closed-loop DP systems.

Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering
Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (CN), Xintai People's Hospital (CN), Beihang University (CN)
Beihang University
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.