A Multi-Objective Evaluation Framework for Analyzing Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs in Machine Learning Systems

The evaluation of fairness models in Machine Learning involves complex challenges, such as defining appropriate metrics, balancing trade-offs between utility and fairness, and there are still gaps in this stage. This work presents a novel multi-objective evaluation framework that enables the analysis of utility-fairness trade-offs in Machine Learning systems. The framework was developed using criteria from Multi-Objective Optimization that collect comprehensive information regarding this complex evaluation task. The assessment of multiple Machine Learning systems is summarized, both quantitatively and qualitatively, in a straightforward manner through a radar chart and a measurement table encompassing various aspects such as convergence, system capacity, and diversity. The framework’s compact representation of performance facilitates the comparative analysis of different Machine Learning strategies for decision-makers, in real-world applications, with single or multiple fairness requirements. In particular, this study focuses on the medical imaging domain, where fairness considerations are crucial due to the potential impact of biased diagnostic systems on patient outcomes. The proposed framework enables a systematic evaluation of multiple fairness constraints helping to identify and mitigate disparities among demographic groups while maintaining diagnostic performance. The framework is model-agnostic and flexible to be adapted to any kind of Machine Learning systems, that is, black- or white-box, any kind and quantity of evaluation metrics, including multidimensional fairness criteria. The functionality and effectiveness of the proposed framework is shown with different simulations, and an empirical study conducted on three real-world medical imaging datasets with various Machine Learning systems. Our evaluation framework is publicly available at <a href='https://pypi.org/project/fairical'>https://pypi.org/project/fairical</a>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2025-ab9a
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Objective Evaluation Framework for Analyzing Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs in Machine Learning Systems

Oscar Jiménez–del–Toro, André Anjos, Lilian Berton, Maíra Fatoretto et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
article

A Multi-Objective Evaluation Framework for Analyzing Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs in Machine Learning Systems

Oscar Jiménez–del–Toro, André Anjos, Lilian Berton, Maíra Fatoretto, Gökhan Özbulak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The evaluation of fairness models in Machine Learning involves complex challenges, such as defining appropriate metrics, balancing trade-offs between utility and fairness, and there are still gaps in this stage. This work presents a novel multi-objective evaluation framework that enables the analysis of utility-fairness trade-offs in Machine Learning systems. The framework was developed using criteria from Multi-Objective Optimization that collect comprehensive information regarding this complex evaluation task. The assessment of multiple Machine Learning systems is summarized, both quantitatively and qualitatively, in a straightforward manner through a radar chart and a measurement table encompassing various aspects such as convergence, system capacity, and diversity. The framework’s compact representation of performance facilitates the comparative analysis of different Machine Learning strategies for decision-makers, in real-world applications, with single or multiple fairness requirements. In particular, this study focuses on the medical imaging domain, where fairness considerations are crucial due to the potential impact of biased diagnostic systems on patient outcomes. The proposed framework enables a systematic evaluation of multiple fairness constraints helping to identify and mitigate disparities among demographic groups while maintaining diagnostic performance. The framework is model-agnostic and flexible to be adapted to any kind of Machine Learning systems, that is, black- or white-box, any kind and quantity of evaluation metrics, including multidimensional fairness criteria. The functionality and effectiveness of the proposed framework is shown with different simulations, and an empirical study conducted on three real-world medical imaging datasets with various Machine Learning systems. Our evaluation framework is publicly available at <a href='https://pypi.org/project/fairical'>https://pypi.org/project/fairical</a>

The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical ImagingVol. 3(Special on FAIMI)
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Idiap Research Institute (CH), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.