Challenges and Complications in Secondary Rhytidectomies, A Systematic Review

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Background</h3> The demand for secondary rhytidectomies is increasing. These procedures are technically more demanding than primary surgery due to postsurgical anatomical changes, presenting unique challenges and risks. The objective of this systematic review is to define these challenges, describe common surgical principles, and summarize the reported outcomes and complications of secondary rhytidectomies. <h3>Methods</h3> A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus using particular keywords. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials, observational studies, comparative studies, case series and case reports that reported the surgical outcomes of secondary rhytidectomies. <h3>Results</h3> 13 articles were included in this systematic review, encompassing 677 patients. Presentation was approximately 9-12 years after primary surgery. The most consistent intraoperative finding was altered anatomy, including a thinner, more delicate superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), fibrosis, and scarred tissue planes. Reported complication rates in cohort studies ranged from 2.0% to 21.1%. The most common complications were hematoma and temporary facial nerve injury, with rates of the latter reaching as high as 11.9% in some series. Other reported adverse events included seroma, minor skin slough, and delayed healing. <h3>Conclusions</h3> A secondary rhytidectomy presents distinct intraoperative challenges stemming from altered anatomy. Despite this increased complexity, the existing literature suggests that overall complication rates are comparable to those of primary facelifts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPRAS Open
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2025.11.007
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Complications in Secondary Rhytidectomies, A Systematic Review

Nancy Emmanuel, Rim Ishak, Gregory Nicolas, Juan Pablo Menendez et al.
JPRAS Open
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

Challenges and Complications in Secondary Rhytidectomies, A Systematic Review

Nancy Emmanuel, Rim Ishak, Gregory Nicolas, Juan Pablo Menendez, Charbel Saad, Jean Paule Joumaa, Ibrahim Harb
article en

Abstract

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Background</h3> The demand for secondary rhytidectomies is increasing. These procedures are technically more demanding than primary surgery due to postsurgical anatomical changes, presenting unique challenges and risks. The objective of this systematic review is to define these challenges, describe common surgical principles, and summarize the reported outcomes and complications of secondary rhytidectomies. <h3>Methods</h3> A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus using particular keywords. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials, observational studies, comparative studies, case series and case reports that reported the surgical outcomes of secondary rhytidectomies. <h3>Results</h3> 13 articles were included in this systematic review, encompassing 677 patients. Presentation was approximately 9-12 years after primary surgery. The most consistent intraoperative finding was altered anatomy, including a thinner, more delicate superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), fibrosis, and scarred tissue planes. Reported complication rates in cohort studies ranged from 2.0% to 21.1%. The most common complications were hematoma and temporary facial nerve injury, with rates of the latter reaching as high as 11.9% in some series. Other reported adverse events included seroma, minor skin slough, and delayed healing. <h3>Conclusions</h3> A secondary rhytidectomy presents distinct intraoperative challenges stemming from altered anatomy. Despite this increased complexity, the existing literature suggests that overall complication rates are comparable to those of primary facelifts.

JPRAS Open
University of Balamand (LB), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Lebanese American University (LB), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.